Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeRouleau, Trotter and Paciocco JJ.A.
Date26 February 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Docket NumberC63487
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 26 – March 2)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 6, 2018
    ...made by the Band Council, the argument that Sands' claim is defeated by s. 2(3) of the Act cannot be sustained. Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 [Rouleau, Trotter and Paciocco E Van Woudenberg, for the appellants M W Shulgan, for the respondent Keywords: Wills and Estates, Legacies, Payment ......
  • Mawhinney v Scobie, 2019 ABCA 76
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 27, 2019
    ...only valid wills are probated: Vout at paras 26-27; Neuberger Estate v York, 2016 ONCA 191 at para 168, 129 OR (3d) 721; Rivard v Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 at para 66, 141 OR (3d) [41] We find that while paragraph 21(b) of the August Will is not as narrow as the appellants suggest, confined to ......
  • Campbell Estate v. Campbell,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 1, 2021
    ...As for the issue of interest, the case law is clear that it is payable. As per Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 (CanLII), the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that the common law “Rule of Convenience” is alive and well. Interest is payable on gifts of personal property such as......
  • Veiga v. Veiga,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 21, 2022
    ...As for interest on the legacy, the case law is clear that interest is payable. In Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181, 141 O.R. (3d) 36, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that the common law “rule of convenience” continues to apply, and it has not been subsumed by r.......
3 cases
  • Campbell Estate v. Campbell,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 1, 2021
    ...As for the issue of interest, the case law is clear that it is payable. As per Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 (CanLII), the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that the common law “Rule of Convenience” is alive and well. Interest is payable on gifts of personal property such as......
  • Mawhinney v Scobie, 2019 ABCA 76
    • Canada
    • Alberta Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 27, 2019
    ...only valid wills are probated: Vout at paras 26-27; Neuberger Estate v York, 2016 ONCA 191 at para 168, 129 OR (3d) 721; Rivard v Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 at para 66, 141 OR (3d) [41] We find that while paragraph 21(b) of the August Will is not as narrow as the appellants suggest, confined to ......
  • Veiga v. Veiga,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • December 21, 2022
    ...As for interest on the legacy, the case law is clear that interest is payable. In Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181, 141 O.R. (3d) 36, the Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed that the common law “rule of convenience” continues to apply, and it has not been subsumed by r.......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (February 26 – March 2)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 6, 2018
    ...made by the Band Council, the argument that Sands' claim is defeated by s. 2(3) of the Act cannot be sustained. Rivard v. Morris, 2018 ONCA 181 [Rouleau, Trotter and Paciocco E Van Woudenberg, for the appellants M W Shulgan, for the respondent Keywords: Wills and Estates, Legacies, Payment ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT