Rivard v. Ontario
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Neutral Citation | 2025 ONCA 100 |
| Citation | 2025 ONCA 100 |
| Docket Number | COA-24-CV-0536 |
| Date | 13 February 2025 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 practice notes
-
Athanasiou v. King
...the motions to strike under r. 21.01(1)(b), I am guided by the principles that Gomery J.A. recently summarized in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para 22: [22] A claim should only be struck under r. 21.01(1)(b) if it is plain and obvious that there is no reasonable prospect it can......
-
Singh v. BMW Canada et al
...plain and obvious that it has no reasonable prospect of success: Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 SCR 959 at 980; Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para 22. All facts pleaded in the statement of claim are assumed to be true unless patently ridiculous or incapable of proof: Hunt a......
-
Sienna v. Duckett
...the time of the motion [to strike]. It may only hope to be able to prove them. But plead them it must.” Recently, in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100, at paras. 51-53, this court recognized that, in a situation where some details about the factual circumstances relevant to a claim are in “t......
-
1943528 Ontario Inc. v. Bayview Foodmart Ltd.
...obvious” that the pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action. The Court of Appeal recently addressed the test in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para. A claim should only be struck under r. 21.01(1)(b) if it is plain and obvious that there is no reasonable prospect it can succeed…......
Get Started for Free
5 cases
-
Athanasiou v. King
...the motions to strike under r. 21.01(1)(b), I am guided by the principles that Gomery J.A. recently summarized in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para 22: [22] A claim should only be struck under r. 21.01(1)(b) if it is plain and obvious that there is no reasonable prospect it can......
-
Singh v. BMW Canada et al
...plain and obvious that it has no reasonable prospect of success: Hunt v. Carey Canada Inc., [1990] 2 SCR 959 at 980; Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para 22. All facts pleaded in the statement of claim are assumed to be true unless patently ridiculous or incapable of proof: Hunt a......
-
Sienna v. Duckett
...the time of the motion [to strike]. It may only hope to be able to prove them. But plead them it must.” Recently, in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100, at paras. 51-53, this court recognized that, in a situation where some details about the factual circumstances relevant to a claim are in “t......
-
1943528 Ontario Inc. v. Bayview Foodmart Ltd.
...obvious” that the pleading discloses no reasonable cause of action. The Court of Appeal recently addressed the test in Rivard v. Ontario, 2025 ONCA 100 at para. A claim should only be struck under r. 21.01(1)(b) if it is plain and obvious that there is no reasonable prospect it can succeed…......
Get Started for Free
