Robillard v. Hydro-Electric Commission, [1954] SCR 695
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Judge | Rinfret, Thibaudeau; Taschereau, Robert; Rand, Ivan Cleveland; Cartwright, John Robert; Fauteux, Joseph Honoré Gérald |
Date | 01 November 1954 |
Citation | [1954] SCR 695,[1954] SCR 756,1954 CanLII 50 (SCC),[1955] 1 DLR 465,[1954] SCR 737,1954 CanLII 363 (SCC),[1955] 1 DLR 81,[1955] SCR 8,1954 CanLII 44 (SCC),[1955] 1 DLR 401,1954 CanLII 353 (SCC),1954 CanLII 19 (SCC),1954 CanLII 17 (SCC) |
Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Litigating Cross-Border Aboriginal Title Claims in Canada: The Possibility (and Necessity) of a Federal Legislative Response to Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam).
...legislation). For a formulation of a strict necessity test, see Attorney-General of Canada v Attorney-General of Quebec, [1947] AC 33 at 86, 1 DLR 81; Fuller, supra note 54 at 713; Fowler v The Queen, [1980] 2 SCR 213 at 226, 113 DLR (3d) 513; Regional Municipality of Peel v MacKenzie, [198......
-
Duggan v. Newfoundland et al., (1993) 107 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 33 (NFTD)
...(a) responsibilities of a judicial nature vested in him ..." [10] In Harris v. The Law Society of Alberta , [1936] S.C.R. 88; [1936], 1 D.L.R. 401, at pp. 104-105 S.C.R., the Supreme Court of Canada, in determining whether or not the discipline committee of a Law Society was performing......
-
Morrison Estate, Re, (1982) 52 N.S.R.(2d) 640 (CA)
...instrument propounded was the last will of a free and capable testator. See also Agar & Tolmie v. Chatham Public General Hospital, [1955] 1 D.L.R. 401." [26] In Re Gregory (1980), 37 N.S.R.(2d) 640; 67 A.P.R. 640, His Honour Judge O Hearn of the Court of Probate for Halifax County said ......
-
Morrison Estate v. Rinehart et al., (2011) 368 N.B.R.(2d) 86 (TD)
...propounded was the last will of a free and capable testator. See also Agar & Tolmie v. Chatham Public General Hospital , [1955] 1 D.L.R. 401."' "[32] Here we have the opinions of two very qualified doctors who did not observe the testator. One concluded that her testamentary a......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
-
Duggan v. Newfoundland et al., (1993) 107 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 33 (NFTD)
...(a) responsibilities of a judicial nature vested in him ..." [10] In Harris v. The Law Society of Alberta , [1936] S.C.R. 88; [1936], 1 D.L.R. 401, at pp. 104-105 S.C.R., the Supreme Court of Canada, in determining whether or not the discipline committee of a Law Society was performing......
-
Morrison Estate v. Rinehart et al., (2011) 368 N.B.R.(2d) 86 (TD)
...propounded was the last will of a free and capable testator. See also Agar & Tolmie v. Chatham Public General Hospital , [1955] 1 D.L.R. 401."' "[32] Here we have the opinions of two very qualified doctors who did not observe the testator. One concluded that her testamentary a......
-
Morrison Estate, Re, (1982) 52 N.S.R.(2d) 640 (CA)
...instrument propounded was the last will of a free and capable testator. See also Agar & Tolmie v. Chatham Public General Hospital, [1955] 1 D.L.R. 401." [26] In Re Gregory (1980), 37 N.S.R.(2d) 640; 67 A.P.R. 640, His Honour Judge O Hearn of the Court of Probate for Halifax County said ......
-
Graves v. Baxter, (1988) 89 N.S.R.(2d) 19 (TD)
...27]. Hawkins v. Coulsdon & Purley U.D.C., [1954] 1 All E.R. 97; [1954] 1 Q.B. 319 (C.A.), appld. [para. 28]. Ottawa v. Munroe, [1955] 1 D.L.R. 465 (S.C.C.), appld. [para. Nohr v. Anderson et al. (1968), 69 D.L.R.(2d) 698 (B.C.S.C.), consd. [para. 28]. Fraser v. Ronsten Developments Ltd.......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Litigating Cross-Border Aboriginal Title Claims in Canada: The Possibility (and Necessity) of a Federal Legislative Response to Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v. Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam).
...legislation). For a formulation of a strict necessity test, see Attorney-General of Canada v Attorney-General of Quebec, [1947] AC 33 at 86, 1 DLR 81; Fuller, supra note 54 at 713; Fowler v The Queen, [1980] 2 SCR 213 at 226, 113 DLR (3d) 513; Regional Municipality of Peel v MacKenzie, [198......