Rodgers v. Sechelt (District) et al., 2015 BCSC 687

JudgeBallance, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateJanuary 21, 2015
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2015 BCSC 687;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 687;[2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 687 (SC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Mehat, 2018 BCCA 242
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 14, 2018
    ...Robinson v. Robinson, 2006 BCSC 663 at para. 35; in Carr v. Cheng, 2007 BCSC 1693 at paras. 2–3; and, in Rodgers v. Sechelt (District), 2015 BCSC 687 at para. [77] The problem with this statement of the test is that there seems to be no single definition of what qualifies as a prima facie c......
  • Mitchell v Candle Lake (Resort Village),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...The requirements of a cause of action for abuse of public office were considered in Rodgers v Sechelt (District), 2015 BCSC 687 at para 17. Describing the tort of misfeasance in public office, the court                ......
  • Challenging Zoning Decisions: Proper And Improper Considerations By Municipal Councillors
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 5, 2015
    ...malicious misuse of power? The British Columbia Supreme Court examined these issues in a recent ruling in Rodgers v. Sechelt (District), 2015 BCSC 687. The bistro and the liquor In 2005, Mr. Brock Rodgers applied to the District of Sechelt to re-zone certain lands in West Sechelt to permit ......
2 cases
  • Insurance Corporation of British Columbia v. Mehat, 2018 BCCA 242
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • June 14, 2018
    ...Robinson v. Robinson, 2006 BCSC 663 at para. 35; in Carr v. Cheng, 2007 BCSC 1693 at paras. 2–3; and, in Rodgers v. Sechelt (District), 2015 BCSC 687 at para. [77] The problem with this statement of the test is that there seems to be no single definition of what qualifies as a prima facie c......
  • Mitchell v Candle Lake (Resort Village),
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...The requirements of a cause of action for abuse of public office were considered in Rodgers v Sechelt (District), 2015 BCSC 687 at para 17. Describing the tort of misfeasance in public office, the court                ......
1 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT