Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2018 SCC 38
Date14 September 2018
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number37679
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
29 practice notes
  • Intellectual Property in Canada's Federal Courts: An Empirical Review of Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ...Tribunal IP Area(s) Keatley Surveying Ltd v Teranet Inc 2019 SCC 43 ONCA ONSC Copyright Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC 2018 SCC 38 FCA FC Copyright AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc 2017 SCC 36 FCA FC Patents, PMNOC Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc 2017 SCC 34 BCCA BC......
  • Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 28, 2022
    ...Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para 112, [2017] 1 SCR 688; Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38 at para 28, [2018] 2 SCR 643; Orphan Well Association, at para 190, supra. It should be recalled that when the statute is in both official lan......
  • Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 67
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 22, 2021
    ...whether a novel question of law has been raised. The Supreme Court of Canada in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38, [2018] 2 SCR 643 at para 57, described the issues in that case as “difficult and novel questions of statutory interpretation”. Simi......
  • O'Leary v. Ragone, 2021 FC 185
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...at 2019 FCA 321); Eli Lilly v Sandoz Canada Inc. 2009 FC 345; Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe 2017 FCA 97 (rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 38); Tippett v Canada 2020 FC 714): whether the information can be obtained from another party or source; the necessity of the order; whether an ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 28, 2022
    ...Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para 112, [2017] 1 SCR 688; Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38 at para 28, [2018] 2 SCR 643; Orphan Well Association, at para 190, supra. It should be recalled that when the statute is in both official lan......
  • Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v Alberta Health Services, 2021 ABCA 67
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • February 22, 2021
    ...whether a novel question of law has been raised. The Supreme Court of Canada in Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38, [2018] 2 SCR 643 at para 57, described the issues in that case as “difficult and novel questions of statutory interpretation”. Simi......
  • Rogers Media Inc. v. John Doe 1, 2022 FC 775
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 27, 2022
    ...choice when it adopted the Copyright Modernization Act, SC 2012, c 20. CIPPIC points to Rogers Communications v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38, where the Supreme Court of Canada refers to Parliament’s choice not to impose a notice and takedown regime in Canada: [26] For example, P......
  • O'Leary v. Ragone, 2021 FC 185
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...at 2019 FCA 321); Eli Lilly v Sandoz Canada Inc. 2009 FC 345; Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe 2017 FCA 97 (rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 38); Tippett v Canada 2020 FC 714): whether the information can be obtained from another party or source; the necessity of the order; whether an ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 firm's commentaries
  • Canadian Internet Law Update – 2018*
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 1, 2019
    ...may be prescribed by regulation. ISP's Entitlement to Costs under a Norwich Order Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38, involved a proposed reverse class proceeding against unknown defendants engaged in illegal Internet sharing of the plaintiffs' copyright protec......
  • Norwich Relief—SCC Provides Guidance on Pre-Trial Disclosure Orders
    • Canada
    • JD Supra Canada
    • September 17, 2018
    ...On September 14, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 confirming the test set out in Leahy for obtaining a Norwich order (consistently applied by lower courts). This case represents one of the first t......
  • Norwich Relief—SCC Provides Guidance On Pre-Trial Disclosure Orders
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 18, 2018
    ...September 14, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 confirming the test set out in Leahy for obtaining a Norwich order (consistently applied by lower courts). This case represents one of the first time......
  • Copyright Law: 2018 Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 5, 2019
    ...law decisions and developments from 2018. Notice and Notice Regime and Norwich Order Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 The Supsreme Court of Canada weighed in on the obligations of internet service providers (ISP) under Canada's "notice and notice" regime and wh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Intellectual Property in Canada's Federal Courts: An Empirical Review of Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Federal Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. 50 Years of History
    • October 4, 2021
    ...Tribunal IP Area(s) Keatley Surveying Ltd v Teranet Inc 2019 SCC 43 ONCA ONSC Copyright Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC 2018 SCC 38 FCA FC Copyright AstraZeneca Canada Inc v Apotex Inc 2017 SCC 36 FCA FC Patents, PMNOC Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc 2017 SCC 34 BCCA BC......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT