Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC,

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah
Citation2018 SCC 38
Date14 September 2018
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number37679

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft), 2022 ABCA 259
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 28, 2022
    ...Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para 112, [2017] 1 SCR 688; Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38 at para 28, [2018] 2 SCR 643; Orphan Well Association, at para 190, supra. It should be recalled that when the statute is in both official lan......
  • O'Leary v. Ragone
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...at 2019 FCA 321); Eli Lilly v Sandoz Canada Inc. 2009 FC 345; Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe 2017 FCA 97 (rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 38); Tippett v Canada 2020 FC 714): whether the information can be obtained from another party or source; the necessity of the order; whether an ......
  • Rogers Media Inc. v. John Doe 1
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 27, 2022
    ...choice when it adopted the Copyright Modernization Act, SC 2012, c 20. CIPPIC points to Rogers Communications v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38, where the Supreme Court of Canada refers to Parliament’s choice not to impose a notice and takedown regime in Canada: [26] For example, P......
  • Canadian Internet Law Update – 2018*
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 1, 2019
    ...may be prescribed by regulation. ISP's Entitlement to Costs under a Norwich Order Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38, involved a proposed reverse class proceeding against unknown defendants engaged in illegal Internet sharing of the plaintiffs' copyright protec......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Fazel v Singer (Wilson Laycraft), 2022 ABCA 259
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 28, 2022
    ...Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia, 2017 SCC 32 at para 112, [2017] 1 SCR 688; Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38 at para 28, [2018] 2 SCR 643; Orphan Well Association, at para 190, supra. It should be recalled that when the statute is in both official lan......
  • O'Leary v. Ragone
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • February 26, 2021
    ...at 2019 FCA 321); Eli Lilly v Sandoz Canada Inc. 2009 FC 345; Voltage Pictures LLC v John Doe 2017 FCA 97 (rev’d on other grounds 2018 SCC 38); Tippett v Canada 2020 FC 714): whether the information can be obtained from another party or source; the necessity of the order; whether an ......
  • Rogers Media Inc. v. John Doe 1
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • May 27, 2022
    ...choice when it adopted the Copyright Modernization Act, SC 2012, c 20. CIPPIC points to Rogers Communications v Voltage Pictures LLC, 2018 SCC 38, where the Supreme Court of Canada refers to Parliament’s choice not to impose a notice and takedown regime in Canada: [26] For example, P......
  • British Columbia Civil Liberties Association v. Canada (Royal Mounted Police)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • December 29, 2021
    ...be taken to ensure such obligations are met “quickly and efficiently” (Rogers Communications Inc. v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 at para 31 [Rogers Communications]). [35] The Respondents concede that an expectation of around six months would be a reasonable timeline for ......
  • Get Started for Free
13 firm's commentaries
  • Canadian Internet Law Update – 2018*
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • May 1, 2019
    ...may be prescribed by regulation. ISP's Entitlement to Costs under a Norwich Order Rogers Communications Inc. v. Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38, involved a proposed reverse class proceeding against unknown defendants engaged in illegal Internet sharing of the plaintiffs' copyright protec......
  • Norwich Relief—SCC Provides Guidance On Pre-Trial Disclosure Orders
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • September 18, 2018
    ...September 14, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 confirming the test set out in Leahy for obtaining a Norwich order (consistently applied by lower courts). This case represents one of the first time......
  • Copyright Law: 2018 Year In Review
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 5, 2019
    ...law decisions and developments from 2018. Notice and Notice Regime and Norwich Order Rogers Communications Inc v Voltage Pictures, LLC, 2018 SCC 38 The Supsreme Court of Canada weighed in on the obligations of internet service providers (ISP) under Canada's "notice and notice" regime and wh......
  • 2018 Year In Review: Litigation
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • February 13, 2019
    ...LLC v Pfizer Canada Inc, 2018 FC 956 17 2018 FC 735 18 2016 FCA 155 19 Maoz Betser-Zilevitch v Nexen Inc et al, 2018 FC 735 at para 97 20 2018 SCC 38 21 Ibid at para 24 22 2018 FCA 53 23 2018 ONCA 890 24 2017 SCC 36 [“AstraZeneca”] 25 2009 FC 676, aff'd 2011 FCA 300 26 2018 FCA 53 27 Ibid a......
  • Get Started for Free