Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56
| Judge | Arnold |
| Court | Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 21, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
| Citations | 2019 NSSC 56 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Pitcher v. Merritt Developments Limited, 2020 NSSC 93
...in the Subdivision, the right to repair and maintain a ROW is ancillary to the grant of ROW. This is made clear in Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56 (see paras. 129 - [91] In any event, the evidence does not establish that the applicants have had possession of the planned Stonebroke Road cont......
-
Schnell v Stene (Heidinger Estate),
...deed, not by subjective wishes, motivations or recollections” (at paragraph 16). c. In Romkey v Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56, Arnold, J. undertook a comprehensive review of the law as to the role of “surrounding circumstances” when interpreting contra......
-
Dietrich v. Woodworth,,
...of right-of-way or easement, my review of Langille, necessarily led me to consider Justice Arnold’s decision in Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56. [52] In Romkey, supra Justice Arnold refers to Langille, at paragraphs 88 to 90 as follows: [88] &......
-
Murphy et al v. Mullen et al,
...ordered the defendants pay the sum of $1,000 for loss of amenities. [52] In Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56, the defendant believed that he had a 12 foot right of way over the plaintiff’s property down to the shore of St. Margaret’s Ba......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
Pitcher v. Merritt Developments Limited, 2020 NSSC 93
...in the Subdivision, the right to repair and maintain a ROW is ancillary to the grant of ROW. This is made clear in Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56 (see paras. 129 - [91] In any event, the evidence does not establish that the applicants have had possession of the planned Stonebroke Road cont......
-
Schnell v Stene (Heidinger Estate),
...deed, not by subjective wishes, motivations or recollections” (at paragraph 16). c. In Romkey v Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56, Arnold, J. undertook a comprehensive review of the law as to the role of “surrounding circumstances” when interpreting contra......
-
Dietrich v. Woodworth,,
...of right-of-way or easement, my review of Langille, necessarily led me to consider Justice Arnold’s decision in Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56. [52] In Romkey, supra Justice Arnold refers to Langille, at paragraphs 88 to 90 as follows: [88] &......
-
Murphy et al v. Mullen et al,
...ordered the defendants pay the sum of $1,000 for loss of amenities. [52] In Romkey v. Osborne, 2019 NSSC 56, the defendant believed that he had a 12 foot right of way over the plaintiff’s property down to the shore of St. Margaret’s Ba......
Request a trial to view additional results