Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al.
| Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
| Judge | SUCHE |
| Citation | 2016 MBQB 239 |
| Date | 16 December 2016 |
| Subject Matter | CONTRACTS,PRACTICE |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Kon and Duke
...depart from it unless there is a compelling or strong reason to do so. See Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239 (CanLII) at paras. [15] The obligation of a court to follow an earlier decision of the same court is sometimes referred to as "judicial com......
-
Rosenberg et al. v. Securtek Monitoring Solutions Inc.
...did under it”. . . . . . [41] This principle was accepted by Suche J. in Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239. [42] ATG commenced its relationship with MFS in the early 1990s to monitor wholesale customers. Previous one-year agreements were replaced w......
-
Isaacson et al. v. Credential Insurance Services Inc.
...what they did under it”. [44] This principle was approved by Suche J. in Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239. Analysis [45] When Isaacson joined Credential in 2004, the parties entered into an employment agreement with an agreed upon position profile......
3 cases
-
R. v. Kon and Duke
...depart from it unless there is a compelling or strong reason to do so. See Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239 (CanLII) at paras. [15] The obligation of a court to follow an earlier decision of the same court is sometimes referred to as "judicial com......
-
Rosenberg et al. v. Securtek Monitoring Solutions Inc.
...did under it”. . . . . . [41] This principle was accepted by Suche J. in Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239. [42] ATG commenced its relationship with MFS in the early 1990s to monitor wholesale customers. Previous one-year agreements were replaced w......
-
Isaacson et al. v. Credential Insurance Services Inc.
...what they did under it”. [44] This principle was approved by Suche J. in Rosenberg et al. v. SecurTek Monitoring Solutions Inc. et al., 2016 MBQB 239. Analysis [45] When Isaacson joined Credential in 2004, the parties entered into an employment agreement with an agreed upon position profile......