Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice C. Ross |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1321 |
| Docket Number | S183230 |
| Date | 08 September 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford
...a real and substantial connection exists between a proceeding and British Columbia” (Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321 at para. 24). The provisions of s. 10 of the Act relevant to this application 10 Without limiting the right of the plaintiff to prove other ......
-
Atom Holdings (Re)
...and (f) the fair and efficient working of the Canadian legal system as a whole. 35 In Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321 at para 62, Madam Justice C. Ross noted that these factors are not exhaustive, and that common law principles of forum non conveniens remai......
-
MM Fund v Excelsior Mining Corporation
...of witnesses and the costs of conducting the litigation in this jurisdiction: Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321 at para. 29 MM says that it is based in Ontario, now downplaying MM's connections to BC as it previously argued in this proceeding. 30 Excelsior ha......
-
Highline Mushrooms West Limited v. 1895742 Alberta Ltd.
...case that a real and substantial connection exists: Cleeves at para. 93, citing Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321. [29] The presumption may be rebutted by the party resisting jurisdiction, in this case 189, by showing that there is no real relationship — or o......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
Cleeves v. The Warden and Fellows of St. Antony’s College in the University of Oxford
...a real and substantial connection exists between a proceeding and British Columbia” (Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321 at para. 24). The provisions of s. 10 of the Act relevant to this application 10 Without limiting the right of the plaintiff to prove other ......
-
Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co., Ltd.
...application was heard on September 8, 2020. The B.C. Supreme Court (indexed as Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321) [57]        AP also submits that both the Repair Agreement and the Rental Agreement are contingent upon the ev......
-
Highline Mushrooms West Limited v. 1895742 Alberta Ltd.
...case that a real and substantial connection exists: Cleeves at para. 93, citing Rotor Maxx Support Limited v. Air Palace Co. Ltd., 2020 BCSC 1321. [29]        The presumption may be rebutted by the party resisting jurisdiction, in this case 189, by showing......