RPM Farms Ltd. et al. v. Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al., 2019 MBQB 140

JudgeDEWAR J.
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
Case DateSeptember 27, 2019
JurisdictionManitoba
Citations2019 MBQB 140
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Niata Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Snowcat Property Holdings Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • March 10, 2022
    ...of a grant.     [43]      In addition to those four essential elements, RPM Farms Ltd. v. Rosenberg, 2019 MBQB 140, [2019] M.J. No. 268 (QL) held at paras. 26 – 29, that the party claiming the prescriptive right over the land of another must demonst......
  • St. Boniface Warehousing Ltd. v. BBD Holdings Ltd., 2019 MBQB 181
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 9, 2019
    ...BBD contends that this case exemplifies aggressive overreaching. Most recently in RPM Farms Ltd. et al. v. Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al., 2019 MBQB 140 (CanLII), Dewar J. discussed the requirements to establish a prescriptive easement in Manitoba as [27] The basic theory of a prescriptive e......
  • Klimack et al v Kroeker et al, 2020 MBCA 98
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • October 7, 2020
    ...CarswellMan 169 at paras 24-25 (QB), aff’d 1989 CarswellMan 168 (CA); and RPM Farms Ltd et al v Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al, 2019 MBQB 140 at paras 22, [16]                    &#......
  • Wilson et al v. Kornelsen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 10, 2022
    ...dominant tenement.  It is a flexible and fact specific analysis.   In RPM Farms Ltd. et al. v. Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al., 2019 MBQB 140 (CanLII), the court held at paragraphs 54 to 58: [54]   …. The criteria that an easement must accommodate a dominant tenemen......
4 cases
  • Niata Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Snowcat Property Holdings Limited,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • March 10, 2022
    ...of a grant.     [43]      In addition to those four essential elements, RPM Farms Ltd. v. Rosenberg, 2019 MBQB 140, [2019] M.J. No. 268 (QL) held at paras. 26 – 29, that the party claiming the prescriptive right over the land of another must demonst......
  • St. Boniface Warehousing Ltd. v. BBD Holdings Ltd., 2019 MBQB 181
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • December 9, 2019
    ...BBD contends that this case exemplifies aggressive overreaching. Most recently in RPM Farms Ltd. et al. v. Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al., 2019 MBQB 140 (CanLII), Dewar J. discussed the requirements to establish a prescriptive easement in Manitoba as [27] The basic theory of a prescriptive e......
  • Klimack et al v Kroeker et al, 2020 MBCA 98
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Manitoba)
    • October 7, 2020
    ...CarswellMan 169 at paras 24-25 (QB), aff’d 1989 CarswellMan 168 (CA); and RPM Farms Ltd et al v Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al, 2019 MBQB 140 at paras 22, [16]                    &#......
  • Wilson et al v. Kornelsen,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • January 10, 2022
    ...dominant tenement.  It is a flexible and fact specific analysis.   In RPM Farms Ltd. et al. v. Laurence Jay Rosenberg et al., 2019 MBQB 140 (CanLII), the court held at paragraphs 54 to 58: [54]   …. The criteria that an easement must accommodate a dominant tenemen......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT