S.B.R. v. L.L.R.,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeWILKINSON J.
Citation2018 SKQB 177
Docket NumberDiv 10 of 2017
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date07 June 2018

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 practice notes
  • Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • June 18, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......
  • Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...documents must have “some degree of genuine relevance” to be caught within the net of a party's disclosure obligation ( S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 ......
  • MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 17, 2021
    ...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5]   &#x......
  • DEARBORN v. DEARBORN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 13, 2019
    ...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
  • Get Started for Free
5 cases
  • Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...documents must have “some degree of genuine relevance” to be caught within the net of a party's disclosure obligation ( S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 ......
  • MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • November 17, 2021
    ...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5]   &#x......
  • DEARBORN v. DEARBORN,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • August 13, 2019
    ...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
  • TOMCALA v. INPUT CAPITAL CORP.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • March 30, 2022
    ...A modern approach to a question of relevance is articulated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 [S.B.R.]. There, she explained there are several important considerations when determining if the contents of a document are relevant, including a need for what she called “s......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Law Society Case Digests
    • June 18, 2018
    ...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......