S.B.R. v. L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | WILKINSON J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 177 |
| Docket Number | Div 10 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 07 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......
-
MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION,
...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5] &#x......
-
DEARBORN v. DEARBORN, 2019 SKQB 192
...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
-
TOMCALA v. INPUT CAPITAL CORP.,
...A modern approach to a question of relevance is articulated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 [S.B.R.]. There, she explained there are several important considerations when determining if the contents of a document are relevant, including a need for what she called “s......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION,
...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5] &#x......
-
DEARBORN v. DEARBORN, 2019 SKQB 192
...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
-
TOMCALA v. INPUT CAPITAL CORP.,
...A modern approach to a question of relevance is articulated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 [S.B.R.]. There, she explained there are several important considerations when determining if the contents of a document are relevant, including a need for what she called “s......
-
M.B. v. A.F.,
...Boyd v. Fields, [2006] O.J. No. 5762 (S.C.J.); Kovachis v. Kovachis, 2013 ONCA 663; Milgrom v. Levy, 2019 ONSC 564; and S.B.R. v. L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177. [190] In this case before me, the mother seeks the father’s joint bank statements from January 1, 2017 to September 21, 2020, proof of any......
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......