S.B.R. v. L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | WILKINSON J. |
Citation | 2018 SKQB 177 |
Docket Number | Div 10 of 2017 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Date | 07 June 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......
-
Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
...documents must have “some degree of genuine relevance” to be caught within the net of a party's disclosure obligation ( S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 ......
-
MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION, 2021 SKQB 299
...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5] ......
-
DEARBORN v. DEARBORN, 2019 SKQB 192
...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Bell v Insulation Applicators Ltd,
...documents must have “some degree of genuine relevance” to be caught within the net of a party's disclosure obligation ( S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 31 [ S.B.R.]; May v Saskatchewan Power Corporation, 2021 SKQB 299 at para 19; Tomcala v Input Capital Corp., 2022 SKQB 89 at para 9 ......
-
MAY v. SASKATCHEWAN POWER CORPORATION, 2021 SKQB 299
...2013 SKQB 394, 432 Sask R 63; R.J. England Consulting Ltd. v Palantir Property 2001 Inc., 2014 SKQB 65, 439 Sask R 255; S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 at para 3 [S.B.R.]; and Canadian Pacific Railway Co. v Saskatchewan, 2019 SKQB 233 at paras 11-14, [2020] 3 CTC 49. [5] ......
-
DEARBORN v. DEARBORN, 2019 SKQB 192
...absent proof that they are directly relevant to the issues before the court. As succinctly stated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177: [31] Under the new Queen’s Bench Rules, broad relevance is no longer the governing test when the parameters of disclosure are in dispute. Prop......
-
TOMCALA v. INPUT CAPITAL CORP., 2022 SKQB 89
...A modern approach to a question of relevance is articulated by Wilkinson J. in S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177 [S.B.R.]. There, she explained there are several important considerations when determining if the contents of a document are relevant, including a need for what she called “s......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Digest: S.B.R. v L.L.R., 2018 SKQB 177
...as: 2018 SKQB 177 Docket Number: QB17566 , DIV 10/17 JCS Court: Court of Queen's Bench Date: 2018-06-18 Judges: Wilkinson Subjects: Civil Procedure � Family Law Proceedings � Notice to Disclose Civil Procedure � Queen�s Bench Rules, Rule 15-33 Digest: The parties separated in November 2015.......