S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M.,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Butler |
| Neutral Citation | 2017 BCSC 34 |
| Subject Matter | FAMILY LAW,PRACTICE |
| Docket Number | E120604 |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 34 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 10 January 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 89,
...(3d) 166 (C.A.), at paras. 22–23 … [174] The Louie Group rely on Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 and S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M, 2017 BCSC 34. However, both cases deal with the award of costs itself, not with a court's discretion under s.8 of the Court Order Interest Act. In any eve......
-
Chavez-Salinas v Tower,
...(3d) 166 (C.A.), at paras. 22–23 … [174] The Louie Group rely on Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 and S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M, 2017 BCSC 34. However, both cases deal with the award of costs itself, not with a court's discretion under s.8 of the Court Order Interest Act. In any eve......
-
L.I.W. v. T.R.W., 2017 BCSC 693
...Xerox Canada Inc. v. Sweany (1990), 42 C.P.C. (2d) 101 (B.C.S.C.); Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 at paras. 27, 30–33; S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34 at paras. 17, [46] In S.R.M., at para. 20, Butler J. addressed the challenges that flow from delay in resolving the cost implications of a c......
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34
...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34 Date: 20170110 Docket: E120604 Registry: Vancouver Between: S.R.M. Claimant And N.G.T.M. also known as N.T.M. Respondent Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Claiman......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
2023 BCSC 89,
...(3d) 166 (C.A.), at paras. 22–23 … [174] The Louie Group rely on Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 and S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M, 2017 BCSC 34. However, both cases deal with the award of costs itself, not with a court's discretion under s.8 of the Court Order Interest Act. In any eve......
-
Chavez-Salinas v Tower,
...(3d) 166 (C.A.), at paras. 22–23 … [174] The Louie Group rely on Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 and S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M, 2017 BCSC 34. However, both cases deal with the award of costs itself, not with a court's discretion under s.8 of the Court Order Interest Act. In any eve......
-
L.I.W. v. T.R.W., 2017 BCSC 693
...Xerox Canada Inc. v. Sweany (1990), 42 C.P.C. (2d) 101 (B.C.S.C.); Bay v. Pasieka, 2014 BCSC 809 at paras. 27, 30–33; S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34 at paras. 17, [46] In S.R.M., at para. 20, Butler J. addressed the challenges that flow from delay in resolving the cost implications of a c......
-
S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34
...SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Citation: S.R.M. v. N.G.T.M., 2017 BCSC 34 Date: 20170110 Docket: E120604 Registry: Vancouver Between: S.R.M. Claimant And N.G.T.M. also known as N.T.M. Respondent Before: The Honourable Mr. Justice Butler Reasons for Judgment Counsel for the Claiman......
Request a trial to view additional results