S.A.R. v A.K.L.,
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Leurer, Barrington-Foote and Kalmakoff JJ.A. |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 SKCA 124 |
| Citation | 2021 SKCA 124 |
| Docket Number | CACV3476 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Date | 15 September 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...of correctness. Alleged erroneous factual findings are reviewed on the standard of palpable and overriding error: see S.A.R. v A.K.L., 2021 SKCA 124 at para 14 [ S.A.R.]; Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 at paras 13-15, [2001] 2 SCR 1014; Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at para 20, 30 ......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...reasonably be seen as having affected the conclusion, it does not provide a basis for appellate intervention” ( S.A.R. v A.K.L., 2021 SKCA 124 at para 29 The mother submits that the Chambers judge erred in failing to recognize the harm to the child associated with the father's a......
2 cases
-
Friesen v Friesen,
...of correctness. Alleged erroneous factual findings are reviewed on the standard of palpable and overriding error: see S.A.R. v A.K.L., 2021 SKCA 124 at para 14 [ S.A.R.]; Van de Perre v Edwards, 2001 SCC 60 at paras 13-15, [2001] 2 SCR 1014; Peterson v Peterson, 2019 SKCA 76 at para 20, 30 ......
-
O.M.S. v E.J.S.,
...reasonably be seen as having affected the conclusion, it does not provide a basis for appellate intervention” ( S.A.R. v A.K.L., 2021 SKCA 124 at para 29 The mother submits that the Chambers judge erred in failing to recognize the harm to the child associated with the father's a......