Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | McLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm |
| Citation | 2017 SCC 28,[2017] 1 SCR 543,[2017] SCJ No 28 (QL) |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Date | 02 June 2017 |
| Docket Number | 36703 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
140 practice notes
-
Raponi v. Olympia Trust Company,
...[70] 2018 ONSC 1956, aff’d 2019 ONCA 54. [71] Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Lt......
-
Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
...430, (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1997] S.C.C.A. No. 656; Grandview (Town) v. Doering, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 621. [14] 2008 SCC 27. [15] 2017 SCC 28. [16] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. [17] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shoppin......
-
Goyal v. Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2018 ONSC 2768
...2008 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC [18] [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.). [19] [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.). [20] [1964] A.C. 465 (H.......
-
Reddock v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONSC 5053
...Acoustic Lathing and Insulation Local 675 Pension Fund (Trustees of) v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., 2016 ONSC 5784 at paras. 122-131. [64] 2017 SCC 28. [65] 2008 SCC [66] eau Case on a summary judgment motion. [204] Although I did not make such a determination in the Brazeau Case......
Request a trial to view additional results
94 cases
-
1688782 Ontario Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2020 SCC 35
...537; Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860; D’Amato v. Badger, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 1071; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 543; Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E. 99 (1928); Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 263; Doh......
-
Raponi v. Olympia Trust Company,
...[70] 2018 ONSC 1956, aff’d 2019 ONCA 54. [71] Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Lt......
-
Goyal v. Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2018 ONSC 2768
...2008 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC [18] [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.). [19] [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.). [20] [1964] A.C. 465 (H.......
-
Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
...430, (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1997] S.C.C.A. No. 656; Grandview (Town) v. Doering, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 621. [14] 2008 SCC 27. [15] 2017 SCC 28. [16] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. [17] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shoppin......
Request a trial to view additional results
30 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 8, 2022 ' August 12, 2022)
...Agency, 2013 BCCA 34, Goodwin v. Goodwin, 2007 BCCA 81, Paradis Honey Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 89, Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, Clements v. Clements, 2012 SCC 32, Donleavy v. Ultramar Ltd., 2019 ONCA 687, Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, M......
-
Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 11-15, 2019)
...Prinzo v Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care (2002), 60 OR (3d) 474 , Boucher v Wal-Mart Canada Corp, 2014 ONCA 419 , Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, Piresferreira v Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384 Caja Paraguaya De Jubilaciones v. Obregon, 2019 ONCA 198 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Appeals, In......
-
Proving Damages For Mental Injury: Guidance From The Supreme Court Of Canada
...able to show that the plaintiff has not met those baseline thresholds, the claim for mental injury has not been established. Footnotes 1 2017 SCC 28 2 2008 SCC 27 3 Supra note 1 at para 21 4 Ibid at para 37 5 Ibid at para 38 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide......
-
2017: A Year In Review And A Look Ahead
...cases. Whenever the Supreme Court of Canada rules on an issue, it is important to pay close attention. In the case of Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, the Court ruled that an injured claimant does not need to have a diagnosed psychological / psychiatric injury in order to recover for a men......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
-
Introduction
...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
-
Book Review: Defending Class Actions in Canada: A Guide for Defendants
...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
-
Flash Boys Class Actions: Civil Fraud, Conspiracy, and the Certifiability of High-frequency Trading Cases in Canada
...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
-
An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
Request a trial to view additional results