Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Wagner, Richard; Gascon, Clément; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm
Citation2017 SCC 28,[2017] 1 SCR 543,[2017] SCJ No 28 (QL)
Date02 June 2017
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number36703
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
140 practice notes
  • Goyal v. Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2018 ONSC 2768
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 30, 2018
    ...2008 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC [18] [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.). [19] [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.). [20] [1964] A.C. 465 (H.......
  • Price v. Smith & Wesson Corp., 2021 ONSC 1114
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • February 11, 2021
    ...SCC 27; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63; Rankin (Rankin's Garage & Sales) v. J.J., 2018 SCC 19. [21] [1978] A.......
  • Reddock v. Canada (Attorney General), 2019 ONSC 5053
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 29, 2019
    ...Acoustic Lathing and Insulation Local 675 Pension Fund (Trustees of) v. SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., 2016 ONSC 5784 at paras. 122-131. [64] 2017 SCC 28. [65] 2008 SCC [66] eau Case on a summary judgment motion. [204] Although I did not make such a determination in the Brazeau Case......
  • Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System, 2018 ONSC 6315
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • October 25, 2018
    ...v. Culligan of Canada Ltd., 2008 SCC 27 at para. 3. [53] Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Ltd. 2008 SCC 27 ; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Healey v. Lakeridge Health Corp., 2011 ONCA [54] 2017 SCC 28 at para. 37. [55] Haig v. Bamford, [1976] 1 S.C.R. 466 ; Kamloops (City) v. Nielse......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
94 cases
  • 1688782 Ontario Inc. v. Maple Leaf Foods Inc., 2020 SCC 35
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 6, 2020
    ...537; Martel Building Ltd. v. Canada, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 S.C.R. 860; D’Amato v. Badger, [1996] 2 S.C.R. 1071; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 S.C.R. 543; Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad Co., 162 N.E. 99 (1928); Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, 2003 SCC 69, [2003] 3 S.C.R. 263; Doh......
  • Raponi v. Olympia Trust Company,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 2, 2022
    ...[70] 2018 ONSC 1956, aff’d 2019 ONCA 54. [71] Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; Mustapha v. Culligan of Canada Lt......
  • Goyal v. Niagara College of Applied Arts and Technology, 2018 ONSC 2768
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 30, 2018
    ...2008 SCC 42; Fullowka v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 2010 SCC 5; R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., 2011 SCC 42; Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28; Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC [18] [1978] A.C. 728 (H.L.). [19] [1932] A.C. 562 (H.L.). [20] [1964] A.C. 465 (H.......
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...430, (C.A.), leave to appeal refused, [1997] S.C.C.A. No. 656; Grandview (Town) v. Doering, [1976] 2 S.C.R. 621. [14] 2008 SCC 27. [15] 2017 SCC 28. [16] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at para. [17] Hollick v. Toronto (City), 2001 SCC 68 at paras. 15 and 16; Western Canadian Shoppin......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
30 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 8, 2022 ' August 12, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 15, 2022
    ...Agency, 2013 BCCA 34, Goodwin v. Goodwin, 2007 BCCA 81, Paradis Honey Ltd. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 89, Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, Clements v. Clements, 2012 SCC 32, Donleavy v. Ultramar Ltd., 2019 ONCA 687, Deloitte & Touche v. Livent Inc. (Receiver of), 2017 SCC 63, M......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 11-15, 2019)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 28, 2019
    ...Prinzo v Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care (2002), 60 OR (3d) 474 , Boucher v Wal-Mart Canada Corp, 2014 ONCA 419 , Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, Piresferreira v Ayotte, 2010 ONCA 384 Caja Paraguaya De Jubilaciones v. Obregon, 2019 ONCA 198 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Appeals, In......
  • Proving Damages For Mental Injury: Guidance From The Supreme Court Of Canada
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • August 18, 2017
    ...able to show that the plaintiff has not met those baseline thresholds, the claim for mental injury has not been established. Footnotes 1 2017 SCC 28 2 2008 SCC 27 3 Supra note 1 at para 21 4 Ibid at para 37 5 Ibid at para 38 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide......
  • 2017: A Year In Review And A Look Ahead
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 4, 2018
    ...cases. Whenever the Supreme Court of Canada rules on an issue, it is important to pay close attention. In the case of Saadati v. Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, the Court ruled that an injured claimant does not need to have a diagnosed psychological / psychiatric injury in order to recover for a men......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
  • An Overview of Class Actions and Covid-19 in Ontario’s Long-term Care Facilities
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
  • United We Stand, Divided We Fall: Class Actions and Corporate Hegemony
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
  • The Limits of Case Management: A Review and Principled Approach to the Court’s General Management Powers
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 16-2, March 2021
    • March 1, 2021
    ...those affected in this hypothetical situation — and many more in analogous real-life situations — will be 41 42 43 44 Saadati v Moorhead, 2017 SCC 28, [2017] 1 SCR 543. Ibid at para 31. Snell v Farrell, [1990] 2 SCR 311 [Snell]. Clements v Clements, 2012 SCC 32, [2012] 2 SCR 181 at para 38 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT