Saidoun v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2019 FC 1110 |
| Date | 29 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Garcia Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 300
...the RPD’s relevant factual determinations in making his/her determination as to hardship (Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at para 19; Prasla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 56 at para 17; Newman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 803......
-
Dayal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1188
...these factors robustly along with their relationship to the visa applicants: Saidoun et al v Canada, (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at paras 24-25. [38] In its analysis, the IAD limited its BIOC assessment to the proximal relationship between the children and the visa applicant......
-
Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
...48), and that a failure to do so may render an officer’s decision unreasonable (Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at para 19). However, I find that, in this case, the Officer did in fact conduct an analysis of the psychologist’s Report and was right ......
-
Joseph v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 763
...harm if removed to a country that was the cause of her PTSD (at para 8). Likewise, in Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 [Saidoun], the Court held that officers “must consider the likelihood of the mental health condition worsening as a result of the removal......
4 cases
-
Garcia Garcia v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 300
...the RPD’s relevant factual determinations in making his/her determination as to hardship (Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at para 19; Prasla v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 56 at para 17; Newman v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 803......
-
Dayal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1188
...these factors robustly along with their relationship to the visa applicants: Saidoun et al v Canada, (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at paras 24-25. [38] In its analysis, the IAD limited its BIOC assessment to the proximal relationship between the children and the visa applicant......
-
Nyabuzana v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1484
...48), and that a failure to do so may render an officer’s decision unreasonable (Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 at para 19). However, I find that, in this case, the Officer did in fact conduct an analysis of the psychologist’s Report and was right ......
-
Joseph v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 763
...harm if removed to a country that was the cause of her PTSD (at para 8). Likewise, in Saidoun v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FC 1110 [Saidoun], the Court held that officers “must consider the likelihood of the mental health condition worsening as a result of the removal......