Sandhu v Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 359

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice M. J. Lema
Citation2020 ABQB 359
Docket Number2003 07810
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date04 June 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
4 cases
  • Gomravi v Suite Excel Collections Canada Inc,
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 4, 2020
    ...which were based in whole or in part upon the effects of COVID-19. For example, in Sandhu v Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 359, where Justice Lema concluded that cross-examinations on affidavits should be conducted by video-conference instead of waiting until “ the al......
  • Mostafa Altalibi Professional Corporation v Lorne S. Kamelchuk Professional Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • July 6, 2022
    ...The chambers judge adopted the reasoning of Justice Lema in Sandhu v Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 359 at para 30, where he summarized the rule governing remote questioning on affidavits stating (footnote omitted): Based on: 1.     the Court of Appe......
  • Mostafa Altalibi Professional Corporation v Lorne S. Kamelchuk Professional Corporation,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 3, 2020
    ...far as the jurisdiction to direct that questioning be done by way of video conference, Sandhu v Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 359 makes it clear that I have that authority. I am grateful to Justice Lema for his considered review of the issues in that case. Arconti v. S......
  • Winchester Investments Ltd. v. Polygon Restoration Inc./Polygon Apres Sinistre Inc, 2020 BCSC 999
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 2, 2020
    ...now exist to address that problem (see, for example, the guidance provided in Sandhu v. Siri Guru Nanak Sikh Gurdwara of Alberta, 2020 ABQB 359). [10]        I therefore order that the examination for discovery proceed remotely by video conference arranged......
3 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT