Sandoff et al. v. Loblaw Companies Ltd.
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Judge | Keene, J. |
| Citation | 2015 SKQB 345,2013 Q.B.G. No. 1907 |
| Date | 30 October 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 practice notes
-
Early disposition or prejudicial attrition? An analysis of bill 161 and pre-certification dispositive motions in class actions
...motions at or after certiication. 91 ONSC 1180 [TDL Group]; Li v British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1616 [Li]; Sandof v Loblaw Companies Ltd, 2015 SKQB 345 [Sandof]; Strohmaier, above note 10; WP v Alberta, 2013 ABQB 295; Player Estate v Janssen-Ortho Inc, 2014 BCSC 1122 [Player Estate]; Tk’Emlúps......
-
Krishnan v. Jamieson Laboratories Inc.
...The defendants argue that reliance is also required in order to be entitled to a statutory remedy: Sandoff v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2015 SKQB 345 at paras. 50-53, Clark at para. 126. However, as discussed above, in B.C. and several of the other provinces, it is at least arguable that in......
-
KNUTH v. BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL INC. et al.
...Stewart Enterprise Universal Inc., 2010 ABQB 259 at para 36, 489 AR 153. [20] The Defendants rely upon Sandoff v Loblaw Companies Ltd., 2015 SKQB 345, 51 BLR (5th) 311 in support of their claim. Justice Keene 29 I agree with defence counsel that there is considerable authority for this Cour......
-
Nipping The Class Action In The Bud: Saskatchewan Court Dismisses Claim Pre-Certification
...to defendants seeking to nip class actions in the bud. Note: Markus F. Kremer was co-counsel to the defendants in this case. Footnotes 2015 SKQB 345 ["Sandoff Ibid ., para. 14. Ibid ., para. 22. Ibid. , at para. 41. Ibid. , paras. 4 and 6. Ibid ., para. 28. Ibid ., para. 29. Ibid. , para. 5......
Get Started for Free
3 cases
-
Krishnan v. Jamieson Laboratories Inc.
...The defendants argue that reliance is also required in order to be entitled to a statutory remedy: Sandoff v. Loblaw Companies Limited, 2015 SKQB 345 at paras. 50-53, Clark at para. 126. However, as discussed above, in B.C. and several of the other provinces, it is at least arguable that in......
-
KNUTH v. BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL INC. et al.
...Stewart Enterprise Universal Inc., 2010 ABQB 259 at para 36, 489 AR 153. [20] The Defendants rely upon Sandoff v Loblaw Companies Ltd., 2015 SKQB 345, 51 BLR (5th) 311 in support of their claim. Justice Keene 29 I agree with defence counsel that there is considerable authority for this Cour......
-
Holmes v Jastek
...To date, there has been little guidance with respect to the appropriate manner in which to determine costs. In Sandoff v Loblaw Cos., 2015 SKQB 345, 51 BLR (5th) 311, this Court made an award of in a class action case that was dismissed on a summary judgment application against the represen......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Nipping The Class Action In The Bud: Saskatchewan Court Dismisses Claim Pre-Certification
...to defendants seeking to nip class actions in the bud. Note: Markus F. Kremer was co-counsel to the defendants in this case. Footnotes 2015 SKQB 345 ["Sandoff Ibid ., para. 14. Ibid ., para. 22. Ibid. , at para. 41. Ibid. , paras. 4 and 6. Ibid ., para. 28. Ibid ., para. 29. Ibid. , para. 5......
-
Sandoff V. Loblaw Companies Ltd.: Class Action Considerations For Canadian Food And Beverage Manufacturers
...should consider this in deciding whether to seek summary judgment prior to certification. Footnotes Sandoff v. Loblaw Companies Ltd., 2015 SKQB 345 at para Food and Drugs Act, R.S.C. 1985 c. F-27 at s. 5(1). Nicole E. Negowetti, Food Labeling Litigation: Exposing Gaps in the FDA's Resources......
1 books & journal articles
-
Early disposition or prejudicial attrition? An analysis of bill 161 and pre-certification dispositive motions in class actions
...motions at or after certiication. 91 ONSC 1180 [TDL Group]; Li v British Columbia, 2017 BCSC 1616 [Li]; Sandof v Loblaw Companies Ltd, 2015 SKQB 345 [Sandof]; Strohmaier, above note 10; WP v Alberta, 2013 ABQB 295; Player Estate v Janssen-Ortho Inc, 2014 BCSC 1122 [Player Estate]; Tk’Emlúps......