Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan) |
| Judge | Jackson, Ottenbreit, Caldwell, Whitmore and Schwann JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 SKCA 34 |
| Docket Number | CACV3075, CACV3076, CACV3201, and CACV3205 |
| Date | 25 March 2020 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
R v. Laird
...v Abrametz, 2014 SKCA 84 at para 22, 441 Sask R 86; Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34 at paras 101–108, [2020] 7 WWR 589; R v Perkins, 2007 ONCA 585 at paras 37–42, 228 OAC 120; and Bornyk at [10......
-
Table of Cases
...217 Good Spirit School Division No 204 v Christ The Teacher Roman Catholic Separate School, 2020 SKCA 34 .................................. 198– 99 Grant et al v Canada, [1995] 1 FC 158, 1994 CanLII 3507................................. xiv Hak v Attorney General of Quebec, 2021 QCCS 1466 .......
-
R v D.B.
...facts (see, for example: R v Abrametz, 2014 SKCA 84 at para 22, 441 Sask R 86; Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34 at paras 101–108, [2020] 7 WWR 589; R v Perkins, 2007 ONCA 585 at paras 37–42, 228 OAC 120; and Bornyk at para 11). [36]  &......
-
Grassroots v. His Majesty the King
...states who are parties can bring a claim to the United Nations Human Rights Committee. [9] Saskatchewan v. Good Spirit Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34, 445 D.L.R. (4th) 179, at paras. 8-9, 46, 49 and 61, was primarily resolved on the basis that the applicant did not have standing. The Saskat......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
R v. Laird
...v Abrametz, 2014 SKCA 84 at para 22, 441 Sask R 86; Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34 at paras 101–108, [2020] 7 WWR 589; R v Perkins, 2007 ONCA 585 at paras 37–42, 228 OAC 120; and Bornyk at [10......
-
R v D.B.
...facts (see, for example: R v Abrametz, 2014 SKCA 84 at para 22, 441 Sask R 86; Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34 at paras 101–108, [2020] 7 WWR 589; R v Perkins, 2007 ONCA 585 at paras 37–42, 228 OAC 120; and Bornyk at para 11). [36] In my view, the effect of ......
-
R v Mosquito
...100 at 128; Quebec (Attorney General) v A, 2013 SCC 5 at para 238, [2013] 1 SCR 61; Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34 at para 107, 445 DLR (4th) 179; and [Sidney N. Lederman, Michelle K. Fuerst & Hamish C. Stewart, Sopinka, Lederman & Bryant: The Law o......
-
R v Ochapowace Ski Resort Inc.
...there may be some strength to this argument if that is indeed what had occurred (see Saskatchewan v Good Spirit School Division No. 204, 2020 SKCA 34, 445 DLR (4th) 179), but it is difficult to see any such error in this case as being one that affected the bottom line of the trial judge’s d......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...217 Good Spirit School Division No 204 v Christ The Teacher Roman Catholic Separate School, 2020 SKCA 34 .................................. 198– 99 Grant et al v Canada, [1995] 1 FC 158, 1994 CanLII 3507................................. xiv Hak v Attorney General of Quebec, 2021 QCCS 1466 .......
-
Parents, Children, and Schools
...have been a more diicult claim to make given the school’s oversight of the event. 66 RSO 1990, c E.2, s. 42(13). 67 2014 ONSC 2072. 68 2020 SKCA 34 [ Good Spirit ]. Parents, Children, and Schools 199 decided that the province was either entitled or required under section 17 of the Saskatche......
