Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Ballance |
| Citation | 2017 BCSC 491 |
| Date | 24 March 2017 |
| Docket Number | S111963 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 practice notes
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...2012 ONSC 2414 at paras. 313-314; Gravelle v A1 Security Manufacturing Corp, 2014 ONSC 5472 at para 27; Sateri (Shanghai) Ltd v Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para [465] Cases assessing appropriates damages for inducing contract breach have looked to what the plaintiff would have received had the......
-
Intellimedia Limited Partnership v. Jawad
...Hockey Acquisition Co, Inc v Orca Bay Hockey Limited Partnership, 2009 BCCA 34 at para 61; Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para 328; Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 24 at paras 69, 70 and 91; Matic et al v Waldner et al, 2016 MBCA 60 at paras (c) the ......
-
Brooks v. Habib
...prompt a witness to recall details of an event that he or she had seemingly forgotten: Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para. [141] In Edmondson v. Payer, 2011 BCSC 118, aff’d 2012 BCCA 114, Mr. Justice Smith provided instructive commentary on the evidentiary......
-
National Bank Financial Ltd. v. LePoidevin
...falls: Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 at paras. 75-76; Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para. 467. In some cases, Zoic Studios BC Inc. v. Gannon, 2012 BCSC 1322 at para. 453 being an example, a court may conclude that defendants have......
Get Started for Free
11 cases
-
Remington Development Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
...2012 ONSC 2414 at paras. 313-314; Gravelle v A1 Security Manufacturing Corp, 2014 ONSC 5472 at para 27; Sateri (Shanghai) Ltd v Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para [465] Cases assessing appropriates damages for inducing contract breach have looked to what the plaintiff would have received had the......
-
Intellimedia Limited Partnership v. Jawad
...Hockey Acquisition Co, Inc v Orca Bay Hockey Limited Partnership, 2009 BCCA 34 at para 61; Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para 328; Strother v 3464920 Canada Inc, 2007 SCC 24 at paras 69, 70 and 91; Matic et al v Waldner et al, 2016 MBCA 60 at paras (c) the ......
-
Brooks v. Habib
...prompt a witness to recall details of an event that he or she had seemingly forgotten: Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para. [141] In Edmondson v. Payer, 2011 BCSC 118, aff’d 2012 BCCA 114, Mr. Justice Smith provided instructive commentary on the evidentiary......
-
National Bank Financial Ltd. v. LePoidevin
...falls: Cadbury Schweppes Inc. v. FBI Foods, [1999] 1 S.C.R. 142 at paras. 75-76; Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491 at para. 467. In some cases, Zoic Studios BC Inc. v. Gannon, 2012 BCSC 1322 at para. 453 being an example, a court may conclude that defendants have......
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
B.C. Court Clarifies Limits On Departing Employee's Use Of Employer Information And Diversion Of 'Corporate Opportunity'
...Sateri (Shanghai) Management Limited v. Vinall, 2017 BCSC 491, the B.C. Supreme Court summed up the law governing how far a departing employee can go in effectively assisting a new employer, including through sharing his or her current employer's confidential information or in diverting a "......
