Savik Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Nunavut et al., [2004] Nunavut Cases 4 (CJ)
Judge | Kilpatrick, J. |
Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
Case Date | December 11, 2003 |
Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
Citations | [2004] Nunavut Cases 4 (CJ);2004 NUCJ 04 |
Savik Ent. Ltd. v. Nunavut, [2004] Nunavut Cases 4 (CJ)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2004] Nunavut Cases TBEd. JA.062
Savik Enterprises Ltd., J.R. Peyton Enterprises Ltd. and Enokseot Holdings Ltd. and The Commissioner of Nunavut as represented by the Government of Nunavut and The Minister of Public Works and Services and Arctic Co-Operatives Ltd.
(0100414CV; 2004 NUCJ 04)
Indexed As: Savik Enterprises Ltd. et al. v. Nunavut et al.
Nunavut Court of Justice
Kilpatrick, J.
January 5, 2004.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Practice - Topic 685.2
Parties - Adding or substituting parties - Intervenors - On a motion - See paragraphs 5 to 20.
Practice - Topic 4574.9
Discovery - What documents must be produced - Privilege - Partial privilege - See paragraphs 21 to 39.
Counsel:
S. Molgat, for the plaintiff;
J. Mercredi, for the defendant;
C. Sherbo, for the intervener.
This action was heard on December 11, 2003, at Iqaluit, Nunavut, by Kilpatrick, J., of the Nunavut Court of Justice, who released the following decision on January 4, 2004.
Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Qikiqtaaluk Corp. v. Nunavut (Commissioner) et al., 2009 NUCJ 6
...of the business information submitted by the proponents was recognized by this Court in Savik Enterprises v. Nunavut (Commissioner), 2004 NUCJ 04, [2004] Nu.J. No. 1, a decision cited by the respondents in their pre-hearing briefs. Justice Kilpatrick notes the importance of these confidenti......
-
Qikiqtaaluk Corp. v. Nunavut (Commissioner) et al., 2009 NUCJ 6
...of the business information submitted by the proponents was recognized by this Court in Savik Enterprises v. Nunavut (Commissioner), 2004 NUCJ 04, [2004] Nu.J. No. 1, a decision cited by the respondents in their pre-hearing briefs. Justice Kilpatrick notes the importance of these confidenti......