Sawka v. Sawka, 2019 BCSC 1833

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHori
Citation2019 BCSC 1833
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date25 October 2019
Docket NumberE120797
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v Hamilton, 2021 ONSC 274. As to interlocutory orders for the disposition of the matrimonial home in British Columbia, see Sawka v Sawka, 2019 BCSC 1833, citing Reilly v Reilly, [1992] BCJ No 2561 351 Recoskie v Paton, 2014 ONSC 4352 at para 16, Phillips J; Khan v Khan, 2019 ONSC 4687; Kapo......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...v McNeil, 2020 ONSC 1225. As to interlocutory orders for the disposition of the matrimonial home in British Columbia, see Sawka v Sawka, 2019 BCSC 1833, citing Reilly v Reilly, [1992] BCJ No 2561 340 Recoskie v Paton, 2014 ONSC 4352 at para 16, Phillips J; Freiman v Freiman, 2017 ONSC 4981;......
2 books & journal articles
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...v Hamilton, 2021 ONSC 274. As to interlocutory orders for the disposition of the matrimonial home in British Columbia, see Sawka v Sawka, 2019 BCSC 1833, citing Reilly v Reilly, [1992] BCJ No 2561 351 Recoskie v Paton, 2014 ONSC 4352 at para 16, Phillips J; Khan v Khan, 2019 ONSC 4687; Kapo......
  • Matrimonial Property Rights
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Canadian Family Law. Eighth Edition
    • August 3, 2020
    ...v McNeil, 2020 ONSC 1225. As to interlocutory orders for the disposition of the matrimonial home in British Columbia, see Sawka v Sawka, 2019 BCSC 1833, citing Reilly v Reilly, [1992] BCJ No 2561 340 Recoskie v Paton, 2014 ONSC 4352 at para 16, Phillips J; Freiman v Freiman, 2017 ONSC 4981;......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT