Scobie v Thiessen,

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeRichards C.J.S., Ryan-Froslie and Barrington-Foote JJ.A.
Neutral Citation2021 SKCA 47
Docket NumberCACV3677
Citation2021 SKCA 47
Date26 March 2021
CourtCourt of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28; Doncaster v Field, 2019 NSCA 61; Rigillo v Rigillo, 2019 ONCA 548; Gill v Gill, 2021 ONSC 6803; Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47; SAR v 2021 SKCA 124. As to variation proceedings, see now Divorce Act, section 17(3) which supersedes any need for the former section 17(9)......
  • Sawatsky v Isfeld,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 29, 2021
    ...decisions: R v Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26 at para 28, [2002] 1 SCR 869; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 at para 79; and Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47 at para 33, 54 RFL (8th) 256. Reasons serve several useful purposes: they justify and explain the result, clarify to the losing party w......
  • Fraser v Ksenych,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...see Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd., 2021 SKCA 168 at paras 30–40, [2022] 3 WWR 179, and Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47 at paras 31–33, 54 RFL (8th) 256. [61]           I find that the trial judge&#......
  • N.M. v. B.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 30, 2022
    ...Brent argues that this family’s situation is analogous to that in Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47, 54 RFL (8th) 256 [Scobie], in which Ryan-Froslie J.A. [47]           Neither the CLA, nor the Divorce Actmily:"Times New Roman&quo......
3 cases
  • Sawatsky v Isfeld,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • October 29, 2021
    ...decisions: R v Sheppard, 2002 SCC 26 at para 28, [2002] 1 SCR 869; R v Hoskins, 2021 SKCA 23 at para 79; and Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47 at para 33, 54 RFL (8th) 256. Reasons serve several useful purposes: they justify and explain the result, clarify to the losing party w......
  • Fraser v Ksenych,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • August 11, 2022
    ...see Bhagaloo v M2 Construction & Development Ltd., 2021 SKCA 168 at paras 30–40, [2022] 3 WWR 179, and Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47 at paras 31–33, 54 RFL (8th) 256. [61]           I find that the trial judge&#......
  • N.M. v. B.M.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 30, 2022
    ...Brent argues that this family’s situation is analogous to that in Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47, 54 RFL (8th) 256 [Scobie], in which Ryan-Froslie J.A. [47]           Neither the CLA, nor the Divorce Actmily:"Times New Roman&quo......
1 books & journal articles
  • Parenting Arrangements After Divorce
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Canadian Family Law - Ninth edition
    • July 25, 2022
    ...RJ v PJ, 2021 NBCA 28; Doncaster v Field, 2019 NSCA 61; Rigillo v Rigillo, 2019 ONCA 548; Gill v Gill, 2021 ONSC 6803; Scobie v Thiessen, 2021 SKCA 47; SAR v 2021 SKCA 124. As to variation proceedings, see now Divorce Act, section 17(3) which supersedes any need for the former section 17(9)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT