Scott v. Canada (Attorney General)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Judge | The Honourable Mr. Justice Groberman,The Honourable Mr. Justice Harris,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock |
| Citation | 2017 BCCA 422 |
| Date | 04 December 2017 |
| Docket Number | CA41232 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
40 practice notes
-
Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Independent First Nation v. Winnipeg (City)
...General), 2013 SCC 14 ; Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73 . [36] Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422. [37] Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 56 at para. [38] Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC ......
-
La Rose v. Canada
...68). [94] Two recent cases of the British Columbia Court of Appeal exemplify this approach. [95] Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422, 417 D.L.R. (4th) 733 [Scott] dealt with a section 7 claim brought by members of the Canadian Forces which alleged that the government’s compens......
-
British Columbia v. Apotex Inc.
...each claim must stand or fall on the pleadings: Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2013 BCSC 1651 at para. 21, rev’d on other grounds 2017 BCCA 422, leave to appeal ref’d [2018] S.C.C.A. No. 37930 (S.C.C.). [58] In both R. v. Imperial Tobacco Canada, 2011 SCC 42 at paras. 19–20, and Atlant......
-
Kreishan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...a deprivation. [137] The circumstances of this case are analogous to those considered by the BCCA in Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422. Under consideration by the court was what was characterized as a deficient benefit compensation scheme for those injured in the course of m......
Get Started for Free
21 cases
-
Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Independent First Nation v. Winnipeg (City)
...General), 2013 SCC 14 ; Haida Nation v. British Columbia (Minister of Forests), 2004 SCC 73 . [36] Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422. [37] Lax Kw'alaams Indian Band v. Canada (Attorney General), 2011 SCC 56 at para. [38] Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia, 2014 SCC ......
-
Kreishan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
...a deprivation. [137] The circumstances of this case are analogous to those considered by the BCCA in Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422. Under consideration by the court was what was characterized as a deficient benefit compensation scheme for those injured in the course of m......
-
Bigeagle v. Canada
...Any inadequacy of programing by the government cannot be seen as the basis for this cause of action (Scott v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422, at para 89). [208] Also, the SCC has told us that as of now, positive obligations are not required by section 7 of the Charter (Gosselin v Q......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Scow
...by virtue of the application of s. 87. In support of its position on this point, Canada relies on Scott v. Canada (Attorney General), 2017 BCCA 422 at para. 46 for the proposition that on an application to strike all or part of a claim, the Court is not required to treat assertions of law m......
Get Started for Free
