Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Judge | Emery J. |
| Citation | 2020 ONSC 4013 |
| Date | 29 June 2020 |
| Docket Number | 272/14 (Guelph) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
10 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 29 ' April 2, 2021)
...(2004), 73 OR (3d) 401 (Ont CA), Good v. Toronto (Police Services Board), 2016 ONCA 250, Seelster Farms v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, Barker v. Barker, 2020 ONSC 3746, Cirillo v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 3983, Leroux v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 1994, Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [......
-
Quadrangle v. Attorney General of Canada
...a practical, common sense approach focused on the contractual intent of the parties: Seelster Farms et v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, at para. 163, citing 524. Public authorities can enter into a binding contractual relationship even in the absence of a ......
-
Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.
...as well as by a plaintiff to enforce terms of a contract against a defendant: Brown, at paras. 110-111; Seelster Farms Inc. v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4013, at paras. [176] There is no requirement that the third party be specifically named in the agreement in order to be a beneficiary. It is suf......
-
Francis v. Ontario
...Ontario points to one case that has since been decided under the CLPA, namely, Seelster Farms v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, 68 C.C.L.T. (4th) 104, where Emery J. said, at para. The CLPA removes the distinction between decisions that are policy decisions, and decisions th......
Get Started for Free
8 cases
-
Quadrangle v. Attorney General of Canada
...a practical, common sense approach focused on the contractual intent of the parties: Seelster Farms et v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, at para. 163, citing 524. Public authorities can enter into a binding contractual relationship even in the absence of a ......
-
Gilani v. BMO Investments Inc.
...as well as by a plaintiff to enforce terms of a contract against a defendant: Brown, at paras. 110-111; Seelster Farms Inc. v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 4013, at paras. [176] There is no requirement that the third party be specifically named in the agreement in order to be a beneficiary. It is suf......
-
Francis v. Ontario
...Ontario points to one case that has since been decided under the CLPA, namely, Seelster Farms v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, 68 C.C.L.T. (4th) 104, where Emery J. said, at para. The CLPA removes the distinction between decisions that are policy decisions, and decisions th......
-
Unity Health Toronto v. 2442931 Ontario Inc.
...v. Belleville (City), 2013 ONCA 148, 114 O.R. (3d) 561, at paras. 95–100, and Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, 8 B.L.R. (6th) 266, at para. [132] The principled exception does not apply here, for the same reasons as the court has found that there was n......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 29 ' April 2, 2021)
...(2004), 73 OR (3d) 401 (Ont CA), Good v. Toronto (Police Services Board), 2016 ONCA 250, Seelster Farms v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, Barker v. Barker, 2020 ONSC 3746, Cirillo v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 3983, Leroux v. Ontario, 2020 ONSC 1994, Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [......
-
The Ties That (May) Bind: Ensuring Letters Of Intent Do Not Impose Binding Obligations On Parties
...2009 ONCA 36, at paras 29-31. 5. Wallace v. Allen, 2009 ONCA 36, at para 34. 6. Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, at para 7. Seelster Farms et al. v. Her Majesty the Queen and OLG, 2020 ONSC 4013, at para 177. 8. Civil Code of Québec, section 1375. 9. B......
