Setoguchi v Uber B.V.,

JudgeJ.D. Rooke
Neutral Citation2021 ABQB 18
Citation2021 ABQB 18
Docket Number1701 16003
Date08 January 2021
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
38 practice notes
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...Inc 2021 ONSC 3897 (Div. Ct.), aff’g 2021 ONSC 3897, leave to appeal dismissed April 8, 2022 (Ont. C.A.); Setoguchi v. Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18; Atlantic Lottery Corp Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19; Richardson v. Samsung Electronics Canada Inc., 2018 ONSC 6130, aff’d 2019 ONSC 6......
  • Del Giudice v. Thompson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 4, 2021
    ...[1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansregret v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 570.   [65] 2018 ONSC 6315 at para. 211. [66] Setoguchi v Uber B.V. 2021 ABQB 18 at para. 52; Wiseau Studio LLC v. Harper, 2020 ONSC 2504; Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System 2018 ONSC 6315; Larizza v. The Royal Bank of ......
  • Introduction
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • Book Review: Class Actions in Privacy Law
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
  • Palmer v. Teva Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 12, 2022
    ...Inc 2021 ONSC 3897 (Div. Ct.), aff’g 2021 ONSC 3897, leave to appeal dismissed April 8, 2022 (Ont. C.A.); Setoguchi v. Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18; Atlantic Lottery Corp Inc. v. Babstock, 2020 SCC 19; Richardson v. Samsung Electronics Canada Inc., 2018 ONSC 6130, aff’d 2019 ONSC 6......
  • Del Giudice v. Thompson,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • August 4, 2021
    ...[1989] 1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansregret v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 570.   [65] 2018 ONSC 6315 at para. 211. [66] Setoguchi v Uber B.V. 2021 ABQB 18 at para. 52; Wiseau Studio LLC v. Harper, 2020 ONSC 2504; Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System 2018 ONSC 6315; Larizza v. The Royal Bank of ......
  • Winder v. Marriott International, Inc.,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • January 17, 2022
    ...1 S.C.R. 1392; Sansregret v. The Queen, [1985] 1 S.C.R. 570. [19] 2018 ONSC 6315 at para. 211. [20] 2000 SCC 60 [21] Setoguchi v Uber B.V. 2021 ABQB 18 at para. 52; Wiseau Studio LLC v. Harper, 2020 ONSC 2504; Broutzas v. Rouge Valley Health System 2018 ONSC 6315; Larizza v. The Royal Bank ......
  • Arbutus Investment Management Ltd. v. Russell,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 17, 2022
    ...However, such an award is at the court’s discretion: Serban v. Egolf (1983), 43 B.C.L.R. 209 at 214; Setoguchi v Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18 at para. 55; Place Concorde East Limited Partnership v. Shelter Corporation of Canada (2006), 270 D.L.R. (4th) 181 (Ont. C.A.) at para. 76; RINC Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 firm's commentaries
  • Is Cyber-Related Securities Litigation Coming To Canada?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 25, 2023
    ...Co., 2021 ONSC 4112; Lamoureux Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada (IIROC), 2021 QCCS 1093; Setoguchi v. Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18, appeal dismissed 2023 ABCA 45; Kaplan v. Casino Rama Services Inc, 2018 ONSC To view the original article click here The content of this articl......
  • Privacy Class Actions: Continued Difficulty In Jumping Over The Certification Hurdle
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 1, 2022
    ...also refused certification due to insufficient evidence of actual loss include Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968, Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 and Kish v Facebook, 2021 SKQB Takeaways and Lessons for Organizations Chow highlights the continued reluctance of courts to certify class proc......
  • Privacy Class Actions: Continued Difficulty In Jumping Over The Certification Hurdle
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 1, 2022
    ...also refused certification due to insufficient evidence of actual loss include Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968, Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 and Kish v Facebook, 2021 SKQB Takeaways and Lessons for Organizations Chow highlights the continued reluctance of courts to certify class proc......
  • The Court Applies More Muscle To Its Role As Gatekeeper In Certification Of Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 20, 2021
    ...to cases where it is clear that the evidence will not be able to substantiate the allegations in a pleading. Setoguchi v. Uber B.V., 2021 ABQB 18 involved a claim against several Uber entities based on an unauthorized access to digital personal information it held about its drivers and cust......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • A Wrench in the Social Justice Toolbox: Assessing the Constitutional Class Action as a Tool for Addressing Racial Discrimination
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • Revisiting Class Counsel Fee Approvals: Towards Presumptive Validity of Contingency Fee Agreements
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • The Short End of the Stick: Bolstering Legal Protections for Short Sellers in Ontario’s Secondary Market
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • Access to Justice: An Objective Or Incidental Effect of Class Actions?
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 17-1, August 2021
    • August 1, 2021
    ...Superior Court of Justice),11 and 7 8 9 10 11 Ibid at para 67 [emphasis added]. Ibid at para 68. Ibid at para 67. Setoguchi v Uber BV, 2021 ABQB 18 [Setoguchi]. Simpson v Facebook, 2021 ONSC 968 The C a nadia n Cl a ss Action R eview | Volume 17 • No 1 Maginnis and Magnaye v FCA Canada et a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT