Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeFunt
Citation2019 BCSC 9
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket NumberS116719
Date07 January 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 practice notes
  • Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...with the property right of another: see Osborne at 296-97. [53]        Similarly, in Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, Mr. Justice Funt observed at [32]… The tort of trespass is actionable as of right: a defendant’s presence (or interference)......
  • Wilson v. Hunt,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Febrero 2023
    ...SCC ref’d (23 February 1989). A trespass only continues while the defendant remains on the plaintiff's land: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, at para. [44]       Consent is a defence to a trespass action where the defendant proves the plaintiff consente......
  • Mason v. Mansion House Estates Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 20 Diciembre 2021
    ...entered the unit, which is contrary to the requirements that a trespass be direct, intentional or negligent and physical (Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at para.131, citing Philip H. Osborne, The Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011) at 296-298). Thus, this claim is unsupported by t......
  • Manak v. Hanelt,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2022
    ...is not relevant to determining liability as a person in possession of land is not required to accommodate others: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at [40]       Consent or “leave and licence” is a defence to a trespass claim. The burden of proving cons......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 Julio 2021
    ...with the property right of another: see Osborne at 296-97. [53]        Similarly, in Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, Mr. Justice Funt observed at [32]… The tort of trespass is actionable as of right: a defendant’s presence (or interference)......
  • Wilson v. Hunt,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 21 Febrero 2023
    ...SCC ref’d (23 February 1989). A trespass only continues while the defendant remains on the plaintiff's land: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, at para. [44]       Consent is a defence to a trespass action where the defendant proves the plaintiff consente......
  • Mason v. Mansion House Estates Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 20 Diciembre 2021
    ...entered the unit, which is contrary to the requirements that a trespass be direct, intentional or negligent and physical (Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at para.131, citing Philip H. Osborne, The Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011) at 296-298). Thus, this claim is unsupported by t......
  • Manak v. Hanelt,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 23 Agosto 2022
    ...is not relevant to determining liability as a person in possession of land is not required to accommodate others: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at [40]       Consent or “leave and licence” is a defence to a trespass claim. The burden of proving cons......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT