Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Funt |
Citation | 2019 BCSC 9 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | S116719 |
Date | 07 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
...with the property right of another: see Osborne at 296-97. [53] Similarly, in Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, Mr. Justice Funt observed at [32]… The tort of trespass is actionable as of right: a defendant’s presence (or interference)......
-
Wilson v. Hunt,
...SCC ref’d (23 February 1989). A trespass only continues while the defendant remains on the plaintiff's land: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, at para. [44] Consent is a defence to a trespass action where the defendant proves the plaintiff consente......
-
Mason v. Mansion House Estates Ltd.,
...entered the unit, which is contrary to the requirements that a trespass be direct, intentional or negligent and physical (Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at para.131, citing Philip H. Osborne, The Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011) at 296-298). Thus, this claim is unsupported by t......
-
Manak v. Hanelt,
...is not relevant to determining liability as a person in possession of land is not required to accommodate others: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at [40] Consent or “leave and licence” is a defence to a trespass claim. The burden of proving cons......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Ward v. Cariboo Regional District,
...with the property right of another: see Osborne at 296-97. [53] Similarly, in Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, Mr. Justice Funt observed at [32]… The tort of trespass is actionable as of right: a defendant’s presence (or interference)......
-
Wilson v. Hunt,
...SCC ref’d (23 February 1989). A trespass only continues while the defendant remains on the plaintiff's land: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9, at para. [44] Consent is a defence to a trespass action where the defendant proves the plaintiff consente......
-
Mason v. Mansion House Estates Ltd.,
...entered the unit, which is contrary to the requirements that a trespass be direct, intentional or negligent and physical (Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at para.131, citing Philip H. Osborne, The Law of Torts, 4th ed. (Toronto: Irwin Law, 2011) at 296-298). Thus, this claim is unsupported by t......
-
Manak v. Hanelt,
...is not relevant to determining liability as a person in possession of land is not required to accommodate others: Shaman v. Meek, 2019 BCSC 9 at [40] Consent or “leave and licence” is a defence to a trespass claim. The burden of proving cons......
Request a trial to view additional results