Sharma v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
JudgeRussell, J.
Citation[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 330,[2014] F.T.R. Uned. 330 (FC),2014 FC 786
Date08 August 2014
Subject MatterLABOUR LAW,ADMINISTRATIVE LAW,IMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,PRACTICE

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Udobong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 1, 2018
    ...the Officer in interpreting and applying the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions (Sharma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 786 at para 10 [Sharma]). [6] As is well established, the analysis on a standard of reasonableness will be concerned with “the existence of justi......
  • Miranda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 2, 2021
    ...disappeared. [26] There may have been other routes to an extension, but to borrow the Respondent’s use of Sharma v Canada (MCI), 2014 FC 786 [Sharma], in their submissions on s. 205(a), it is not reasonable to require immigration officers to attempt to find any possible way to allow ......
4 cases
  • Ji v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • April 8, 2026
    ...that the Officer’s decision is reviewable on the presumptive standard of reasonableness (Sharma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 786 at para 10). [9] A reasonable decision is “one that is based on an internally coherent and rational chain of analysis and that is justified in ......
  • Udobong v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • March 1, 2018
    ...the Officer in interpreting and applying the relevant statutory and regulatory provisions (Sharma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 786 at para 10 [Sharma]). [6] As is well established, the analysis on a standard of reasonableness will be concerned with “the existence of justi......
  • Ramos v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • August 14, 2017
    ...issues that have been raised by Mr. Ramos are reviewable on a standard of reasonableness (Sharma v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 786, at para 10; Palogan v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2013 FC 889, at para 9). [4] It is common ground between the parties that the Glo......
  • Miranda v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 2, 2021
    ...extension disappeared. [26] There may have been other routes to an extension, but to borrow the Respondent’s use of Sharma v Canada (MCI), 2014 FC 786 [Sharma], in their submissions on s. 205(a), it is not reasonable to require immigration officers to attempt to find any possible way to all......