Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Horsman |
| Citation | 2020 BCSC 1365 |
| Docket Number | M1710151 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 16 September 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
2024 BCSC 752,
...future care costs for Botox treatments, where the efficacy of such treatments was unproven and hypothetical: see e.g., Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 163; Wright v. Dillon, 2009 BCSC 176 at para. 44; Minenko v. Minenko, 2014 BCSC 628 at paras. 110–111; Andreas v. Vu, 2020 BCSC 1144 ......
-
Roy-Noel v Buckle,
...future care costs for Botox treatments, where the efficacy of such treatments was unproven and hypothetical: see e.g., Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 163; Wright v. Dillon, 2009 BCSC 176 at para. 44; Minenko v. Minenko, 2014 BCSC 628 at paras. 110–111; Andreas v. Vu, 2020 BCSC 1144 ......
-
Hawes v. Nyhus, 2021 BCSC 1407
...so long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation: Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 122; Goguen v. Di Maddalena, 2018 BCSC 106. A real and substantial possibility is a lower standard of proof that a balance of prob......
-
Alragheb v. Francis, 2021 BCCA 457
...928 at paras. 163–168; Kingston v. Mann, 2020 BCSC 1889 at paras. 231–232; Chevez‑Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863; and Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at paras. [56] In my view, these cases do not stand as authority for the proposition for which they are cited. In none of the cases is the N......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
2024 BCSC 752,
...future care costs for Botox treatments, where the efficacy of such treatments was unproven and hypothetical: see e.g., Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 163; Wright v. Dillon, 2009 BCSC 176 at para. 44; Minenko v. Minenko, 2014 BCSC 628 at paras. 110–111; Andreas v. Vu, 2020 BCSC 1144 ......
-
Roy-Noel v Buckle,
...future care costs for Botox treatments, where the efficacy of such treatments was unproven and hypothetical: see e.g., Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 163; Wright v. Dillon, 2009 BCSC 176 at para. 44; Minenko v. Minenko, 2014 BCSC 628 at paras. 110–111; Andreas v. Vu, 2020 BCSC 1144 ......
-
Hawes v. Nyhus, 2021 BCSC 1407
...so long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation: Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 122; Goguen v. Di Maddalena, 2018 BCSC 106. A real and substantial possibility is a lower standard of proof that a balance of prob......
-
Alragheb v. Francis, 2021 BCCA 457
...928 at paras. 163–168; Kingston v. Mann, 2020 BCSC 1889 at paras. 231–232; Chevez‑Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863; and Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at paras. [56] In my view, these cases do not stand as authority for the proposition for which they are cited. In none of the cases is the N......
Request a trial to view additional results