Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice Horsman
Citation2020 BCSC 1365
Docket NumberM1710151
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Date16 September 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Hawes v. Nyhus,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 19, 2021
    ...so long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation: Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 122; Goguen v. Di Maddalena, 2018 BCSC 106. A real and substantial possibility is a lower standard of proof that a balance of prob......
  • 2023 BCSC 49,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...is a highly personal decision that involves many factors including the likelihood and tolerance of side effects: Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 183. In my view, it is also a reasonable factor for Mr. Pruett to consider his father's substance use problem in his decision to stop ......
  • Alragheb v. Francis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...928 at paras. 163–168; Kingston v. Mann, 2020 BCSC 1889 at paras. 231–232; Chevez‑Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863; and Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at paras. [56] In my view, these cases do not stand as authority for the proposition for which they are cited. In none of the cases is the N......
  • Pruett v Robert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 11, 2023
    ...is a highly personal decision that involves many factors including the likelihood and tolerance of side effects: Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 183. In my view, it is also a reasonable factor for Mr. Pruett to consider his father's substance use problem in his decision to stop ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Hawes v. Nyhus,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • July 19, 2021
    ...so long as it is a real and substantial possibility and not mere speculation: Athey v. Leonati, [1996] 3 S.C.R. 458; Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 122; Goguen v. Di Maddalena, 2018 BCSC 106. A real and substantial possibility is a lower standard of proof that a balance of prob......
  • 2023 BCSC 49,
    • Canada
    • January 1, 2023
    ...is a highly personal decision that involves many factors including the likelihood and tolerance of side effects: Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 183. In my view, it is also a reasonable factor for Mr. Pruett to consider his father's substance use problem in his decision to stop ......
  • Alragheb v. Francis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • December 6, 2021
    ...928 at paras. 163–168; Kingston v. Mann, 2020 BCSC 1889 at paras. 231–232; Chevez‑Babcock v. Peerens, 2020 BCSC 863; and Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at paras. [56] In my view, these cases do not stand as authority for the proposition for which they are cited. In none of the cases is the N......
  • Pruett v Robert,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • January 11, 2023
    ...is a highly personal decision that involves many factors including the likelihood and tolerance of side effects: Sharma v. Day, 2020 BCSC 1365 at para. 183. In my view, it is also a reasonable factor for Mr. Pruett to consider his father's substance use problem in his decision to stop ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT