Shatirishvili et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 173 (FC)

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeStrickland, J.
CourtFederal Court (Canada)
Subject MatterIMMIGRATION AND REFUGEE,EVIDENCE,DAMAGE AWARDS,TORTS,CRIMINAL LAW
Date01 May 2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Alomari et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism), 2015 FC 573
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Octubre 2014
    ...; 2003 FCT 116 , refd to. [para. 8]. Shatirishvili et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 173 ; 2014 FC 407, refd to. [para. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 ; 372 N.R. 1 ; 329 N.B.R.(2d) 1 ; 844 A.P.R. 1 ; ......
  • Baloch v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1373
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 4 Octubre 2022
    ...statements at a POE, on Basis of Claim forms and in a claimant’s testimony: Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 407, at para 29. [53] With respect to the use of statements made at the POE, Justice Walker explained in Gaprindashvili v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Del Pilar Platin Vargas et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 309 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 Mayo 2014
    ...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2007 FC 889 at paras 14-15; Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 407 at para 29). When asked why she did not include the incident in her PIF, she stated that she did not remember why and offered no explanation fo......
  • Xheli v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 181
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2015
    ...of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2003 FCT 116, 228 FTR 43 at paragraph 7; Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 407, at para 19). However, this does not mean that the credibility findings made by the RPD are immune from review ( Rajaratnam v Canada (Minister of Cit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Alomari et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship, Immigration and Multiculturalism), 2015 FC 573
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 23 Octubre 2014
    ...; 2003 FCT 116 , refd to. [para. 8]. Shatirishvili et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 173 ; 2014 FC 407, refd to. [para. New Brunswick (Board of Management) v. Dunsmuir, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 190 ; 372 N.R. 1 ; 329 N.B.R.(2d) 1 ; 844 A.P.R. 1 ; ......
  • Baloch v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1373
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 4 Octubre 2022
    ...statements at a POE, on Basis of Claim forms and in a claimant’s testimony: Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2014 FC 407, at para 29. [53] With respect to the use of statements made at the POE, Justice Walker explained in Gaprindashvili v Canada (Citizenship and ......
  • Del Pilar Platin Vargas et al. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2014] F.T.R. Uned. 309 (FC)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 22 Mayo 2014
    ...v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2007 FC 889 at paras 14-15; Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 407 at para 29). When asked why she did not include the incident in her PIF, she stated that she did not remember why and offered no explanation fo......
  • Xheli v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), [2015] F.T.R. Uned. 181
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Abril 2015
    ...of Citizenship and Immigration) , 2003 FCT 116, 228 FTR 43 at paragraph 7; Shatirishvili v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) , 2014 FC 407, at para 19). However, this does not mean that the credibility findings made by the RPD are immune from review ( Rajaratnam v Canada (Minister of Cit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT