Shreedhar v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 14
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2023 FCA 14 |
| Date | 19 January 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Amer v. Shaw Communications Canada Inc., 2023 FCA 237
...misapprehended or failed to account for the evidence before it”: see Vavilov at para. 125; Shreedhar v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 14, 2023 A.C.W.S. 223 at para. 7; Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada (Senate), 2023 FCA 111, 2023 A.C.W.S. 2155 at para. 12; Gulia v. C......
-
Madureira v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 211
...on judicial review and gives this Court no basis to intervene: Vavilov at paras 75, 83, 116, 125; Shreedhar v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 14 at para 7. [11] In oral submissions, the Madureiras raised an argument that the officer’s best interests analysis should have included ......
2 cases
-
Amer v. Shaw Communications Canada Inc., 2023 FCA 237
...misapprehended or failed to account for the evidence before it”: see Vavilov at para. 125; Shreedhar v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 14, 2023 A.C.W.S. 223 at para. 7; Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada (Senate), 2023 FCA 111, 2023 A.C.W.S. 2155 at para. 12; Gulia v. C......
-
Madureira v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 211
...on judicial review and gives this Court no basis to intervene: Vavilov at paras 75, 83, 116, 125; Shreedhar v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FCA 14 at para 7. [11] In oral submissions, the Madureiras raised an argument that the officer’s best interests analysis should have included ......