Sidhu v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2017 FC 1139 |
| Date | 13 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Tuiran v, Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 324
...at para 38; Oei v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 466 at para 42; Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 at para 13). [19] Given that the Respondent determined that procedural fairness required further follow-up with the Applicant, that the App......
-
Al Fares v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 373
...a later date, particularly in this case, since the Principal Applicant filed no affidavit (Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 at para 13; Bashir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 868 at para 4). [46] The Respondent argues that there are no requ......
-
Saran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Respondent argues that contemporaneous GCMS notes are preferred to subsequent affidavits: Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 [Sidhu] at para 13. In my view, such preference depends on the circumstances. I note in Sidhu, for example, that both parties submitted fresh ......
3 cases
-
Tuiran v, Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2018 FC 324
...at para 38; Oei v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 466 at para 42; Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 at para 13). [19] Given that the Respondent determined that procedural fairness required further follow-up with the Applicant, that the App......
-
Al Fares v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 373
...a later date, particularly in this case, since the Principal Applicant filed no affidavit (Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 at para 13; Bashir v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2002 FCT 868 at para 4). [46] The Respondent argues that there are no requ......
-
Saran v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...Respondent argues that contemporaneous GCMS notes are preferred to subsequent affidavits: Sidhu v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2017 FC 1139 [Sidhu] at para 13. In my view, such preference depends on the circumstances. I note in Sidhu, for example, that both parties submitted fresh ......