Simplifying access to justice: Michael Eizenga publishes the class actions Handbook, an essential, multi-jurisdictional resource for Canadian jurists

AuthorShaun E Finn
PositionLitigation partner at BCF LLP and co-leader of the firm's Class Action Defence Group
Pages5-22
5
SIMPLIFYING ACCESS TO JUSTICE:
MICHAEL EIZENGA PUBLISHES
THE CLASS ACTIONS HANDBOOK
, AN
ESSENTIAL, MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL
RESOURCE FOR CANADIAN JURISTS
Shaun E Finn, BCF LLP*
A. INTRODUCTION: AN ACCESSIBLE REFERENCE
FOR JURISTS FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY
In the very f‌irst sentence of his latest work, The Class Actions Handbook
(the Handbook), a LexisNexis publication, practitioner and author Michael
Eizenga explains that “[a] class action is a procedural tool that allows one
or more persons to bring an action on behalf of, or for the benef‌it of,
numerous persons who have suf‌fered a common wrong. It is intended to
provide an ecient mechanism to achieve redress for widespread harm
or injury.”1 This unique procedural tool provides the basis for eight clear,
thoughtful, and remarkably crisp chapters of analysis. Neither a legal trea-
tise nor a superf‌icial marketing initiative, the Handbook, as its name sug-
gests, is a useful 169-page primer that manages the feat of concentrating
the statutory law of all relevant Canadian jurisdictions and approximately
thirty years of caselaw into a single, accessible volume. In addition to pro-
viding useful background information, it introduces the reader to various
crucial procedural stages and legal considerations. Although designed to
be practical rather than academic in nature and tone, the Handbook, like
the class action itself, remains focused on one central theme: access to
* Shaun E Finn is a litigation partner at BCF LLP and co-leader of the f‌irm’s Class
Action Defence Group. Note that a version of this book review was also published in
the April 2022 edition of the BCF Class Action NetLetter.
1 Michael Eizenga, The Class Actions Handbook (Toronto: LexisNexis, 2022) at 1 [Handbook].
6The Cana dian Cl ass Action Rev iew | Volume 18 • No 1
justice. Appropriately, it is this golden thread that weaves its way through-
out the book, from start to f‌inish.
B. THE DYNAMIC WORLD OF CANADIAN
CLASS ACTIONS
As the Handbook observes, “[c]lass action lawyers know that their practice
area is a dynamic one.”2 This is true from legislative, jurisprudential, and
policy standpoints. Beginning with Québec’s adoption of a class action
regime in 1978, every Canadian province has enacted a class action stat-
ute. Prince Edward Island was the latest and last province to do so when
Bill 36 received royal assent on 17 November 2021.3 Moreover, legislative
reforms continue to be proposed and implemented. In Ontario, the Class
Proceedings Act, 19924 was recently amended pursuant to the Smarter and
Stronger Justice Act, 2020,5 notably with respect to preferability. Québec is
also contemplating possible changes to its codif‌ied class action regime and
has launched a public consultation process.6
In addition to these important legislative developments, class actions
have adapted themselves to virtually all spheres of economic and social
activity. As noted by the Supreme Court of Canada in Western Canadian
Shopping Centres Inc v Dutton, “[t]he class action plays an important role in
today’s world. The rise of mass production, the diversif‌ication of corpor-
ate ownership, the advent of the mega-corporation, and the recognition
of environmental wrongs have all contributed to its growth.”7 In ef‌fect,
“[a] faulty product may be sold to numerous consumers. Corporate mis-
management may bring loss to a large number of shareholders. Discrimina-
tory policies may af‌fect entire categories of employees. Environmental
pollution may have consequences for citizens all over the country. Conf‌licts
like these pit a large group of complainants against the alleged wrongdoer.”8
2 Ibid at ix.
3 Jessica Lam, Alysha Li & Jacob Webster, “P.E.I. Adopts Ontario Class Action Model in
New Legislation” Mondaq (29 March 2022), online: www.mondaq.com/canada/
trials-appeals-compensation/1176778/pei-adopts-ontario-class-action-model-in-
new-legislation.
4 SO 1992, c 6 [Ontario CPA].
5 SO 2020, c. 11.
6 Ministère de la Justice du Québec, Consultation Publique: Perspectives de réforme de
l’action collective au Québec (Québec City: April 2021).
7 Western Canadian Shopping Centres v Dutton, [2001] 2 SCR 534 at para 26 [Dutton].
8 Ibid.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT