Singh v. Chand, 2019 BCSC 2055
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Watchuk |
Citation | 2019 BCSC 2055 |
Date | 29 November 2019 |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Docket Number | M130151 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 854,
...that an appropriate award for non-pecuniary loss would be in the range of $60,000 to $80,000. The defendant relies on Singh v. Chand, 2019 BCSC 2055; Johnson v. Heer, 2020 BCSC 1168; Siddall v. Bencherif, 2016 BCSC 1662; Dhami v. Madden, 2020 BCSC 573; and Manhas v. Jaswal, 2020 BCSC 586. M......
-
Dutton-Jones v Dha,
...that an appropriate award for non-pecuniary loss would be in the range of $60,000 to $80,000. The defendant relies on Singh v. Chand, 2019 BCSC 2055; Johnson v. Heer, 2020 BCSC 1168; Siddall v. Bencherif, 2016 BCSC 1662; Dhami v. Madden, 2020 BCSC 573; and Manhas v. Jaswal, 2020 BCSC 586. M......
2 cases
-
2023 BCSC 854,
...that an appropriate award for non-pecuniary loss would be in the range of $60,000 to $80,000. The defendant relies on Singh v. Chand, 2019 BCSC 2055; Johnson v. Heer, 2020 BCSC 1168; Siddall v. Bencherif, 2016 BCSC 1662; Dhami v. Madden, 2020 BCSC 573; and Manhas v. Jaswal, 2020 BCSC 586. M......
-
Dutton-Jones v Dha,
...that an appropriate award for non-pecuniary loss would be in the range of $60,000 to $80,000. The defendant relies on Singh v. Chand, 2019 BCSC 2055; Johnson v. Heer, 2020 BCSC 1168; Siddall v. Bencherif, 2016 BCSC 1662; Dhami v. Madden, 2020 BCSC 573; and Manhas v. Jaswal, 2020 BCSC 586. M......