SJ v Parkland School Division No 70

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Madam Justice J.M. Ross
Citation2020 ABQB 498
Date28 August 2020
Docket Number1703 04812

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Kissel v Rocky View (County)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2020
    ...QC and Michael Custer For the Applicants Janice Agrios, QC For the Respondents [1] AR 36/2020. In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, Ross J questioned whether that approach remains appropriate after the amendments to the Schedule “C” [2] The Respondents raised, for the firs......
  • Sunshine Village Corporation v Boehnisch
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 26, 2021
    ...offers that are not renewed pending appeal does not continue past the initial proceeding: SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498 at para 13. [36] That said, I am hard-pressed to discern any justice-oriented reason why someone in her position, facing an appeal in which the appell......
  • Abou Shaaban v. Baljak
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 6, 2024
    ...Court of Appeal type costs as contemplated by the commentary in item 8(1) of Schedule C. [24] In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, Justice Ross applied appeal-level costs in a matter involving an appeal and cross-appeal that required a three day hearing where there was an ......
  • Court Costs Part 2: Amendments To Schedule C To The Alberta Rules Of Court
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 4, 2020
    ...a discretion to award a lump sum, or all or a portion of Schedule C costs" (2020 ABQB 519). In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, the Respondent sought enhanced costs, after Schedule C's recent amendment came into effect. Justice Ross noted that "the amendments included re-......
3 cases
  • Kissel v Rocky View (County)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • September 30, 2020
    ...QC and Michael Custer For the Applicants Janice Agrios, QC For the Respondents [1] AR 36/2020. In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, Ross J questioned whether that approach remains appropriate after the amendments to the Schedule “C” [2] The Respondents raised, for the firs......
  • Sunshine Village Corporation v Boehnisch
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • January 26, 2021
    ...offers that are not renewed pending appeal does not continue past the initial proceeding: SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498 at para 13. [36] That said, I am hard-pressed to discern any justice-oriented reason why someone in her position, facing an appeal in which the appell......
  • Abou Shaaban v. Baljak
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 6, 2024
    ...Court of Appeal type costs as contemplated by the commentary in item 8(1) of Schedule C. [24] In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, Justice Ross applied appeal-level costs in a matter involving an appeal and cross-appeal that required a three day hearing where there was an ......
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Costs Part 2: Amendments To Schedule C To The Alberta Rules Of Court
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • November 4, 2020
    ...a discretion to award a lump sum, or all or a portion of Schedule C costs" (2020 ABQB 519). In SJ v Parkland School Division No 70, 2020 ABQB 498, the Respondent sought enhanced costs, after Schedule C's recent amendment came into effect. Justice Ross noted that "the amendments included re-......