SK v DG, 2022 ABQB 425

JudgeLoparco
Citation2022 ABQB 425
Docket NumberFL03 57539
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date21 June 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 practice notes
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...child are significant factor for a judicial decision about the child's best interests, but they are not determinative. See SK v DG, 2022 ABQB 425 at paras 162-164 RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 118 Section 16(3)(e) of the Divorce Act provides that the court shall consider “the child's ......
  • Kirshenblatt v Kirshenblatt,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 24, 2024
    ...Giansante v. DiChiara, [2005] O.J. No. 3184 (Ont. S.C.) at para. 20. 23 B.F. v. A.N., 2024 ONCA 94, [2024] O.J. No. 656 24 S.K. v. D.G., 2022 ABQB 425, at paras. 178–179 and 25 B.J.G. v. D.L.G., 2010 YKSC 44, at para 3. 26 S.O. 1996, c.2, Sched. A. 27 2019 ONCA (Canlii), at paras. 49–54, ci......
2 cases
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...child are significant factor for a judicial decision about the child's best interests, but they are not determinative. See SK v DG, 2022 ABQB 425 at paras 162-164 RM v JS, 2013 ABCA 118 Section 16(3)(e) of the Divorce Act provides that the court shall consider “the child's ......
  • Kirshenblatt v Kirshenblatt,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 24, 2024
    ...Giansante v. DiChiara, [2005] O.J. No. 3184 (Ont. S.C.) at para. 20. 23 B.F. v. A.N., 2024 ONCA 94, [2024] O.J. No. 656 24 S.K. v. D.G., 2022 ABQB 425, at paras. 178–179 and 25 B.J.G. v. D.L.G., 2010 YKSC 44, at para 3. 26 S.O. 1996, c.2, Sched. A. 27 2019 ONCA (Canlii), at paras. 49–54, ci......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT