Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al., (1996) 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72 (CA)
Judge | Flinn, J.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
Case Date | September 06, 1996 |
Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
Citations | (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72 (CA) |
Skipper Fisheries v. Thorbourne (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72 (CA);
452 A.P.R. 72
MLB headnote and full text
Skipper Fisheries Limited, a body corporate (appellant) v. Wayne Thorbourne, Claudette Thorbourne, Thor Seiners Limited, a body corporate, Phoenix Fisheries Limited, a body corporate, Paul Edward Blades, Brian Arthur Blades, Clifford V. Goreham and S. Clifford Hood (respondents)
(C.A. No. 127612)
Indexed As: Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al.
Nova Scotia Court of Appeal
Flinn, J.A.
September 9, 1996.
Summary:
Defendants applied to have the plaintiff found in contempt and the action dismissed, asserting that the plaintiff had deliberately failed to disclose documents and information and to give full discovery relevant to the matters in issue (Nova Scotia Civil Procedure Rule 20.09(2)).
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court, in a decision reported 137 N.S.R.(2d) 62; 391 A.P.R. 62, held that the plaintiff had not complied with rule 20.09(2), but refused to dismiss the action. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay solicitor and client costs for the discovery of the matters in issue and for time spent on the application and reasonable time spent in preparation for the application. The court ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendants' throw-away expert costs. Having made findings of credibility, the judge sealed the decision and excused himself from continuing with the trial. The defendants appealed the sealing of the decision.
The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, in a decision reported 137 N.S.R.(2d) 60; 391 A.P.R. 60, allowed the appeal. After further delay of 18 months (during which costs were disbursed but no documents produced), the defendants again applied to have the plaintiff's claim dismissed for continuing contempt.
The Nova Scotia Supreme Court, in a decision reported 150 N.S.R.(2d) 296; 436 A.P.R. 296, allowed the application. The plaintiff appealed. The defendants applied for an order requiring the plaintiff to include in its appeal book a complete transcript of the hearing of the first application to have the plaintiff found in contempt.
The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, per Flinn, J.A., dismissed the application.
Practice - Topic 9053
Appeals - Record on appeal - Content of record on appeal - A trial judge found a plaintiff in contempt (the first hearing) for failure to disclose documents and information and give full discovery, and ordered the proceedings stayed until the plaintiff had, inter alia, delivered certain documents and information to the defendant - No documents were produced - At a second hearing, the plaintiff's claim was dismissed for continuing contempt - The plaintiff appealed - The defendants applied for an order requiring the plaintiff to include in its appeal book a complete transcript of the first hearing - The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, per Flinn, J.A., concluded that the evidence adduced at the first hearing was neither necessary nor relevant - Further, it would be unduly onerous, especially considering costs, for the plaintiff to be required to reproduce multiple copies of that material.
Practice - Topic 9055
Appeals - Record on appeal - Record of trial evidence or original proceedings - [See Practice - Topic 9053 ].
Statutes Noticed:
Civil Procedure Rules (N.S.), rule 62.14(3) [para. 10].
Counsel:
Peter M. Rogers and Lloyd I. Berliner, for the appellant;
Thomas E. Pittman, for the respondents, Wayne Thorbourne, Claudette Thorbourne and Thor Seiners Ltd.;
Robert G. Belliveau, Q.C., for the respondents, Phoenix Fisheries Ltd., Paul Edward Blades, Brian Arthur Blades and Clifford V. Goreham;
James L. Connors, for the respondent, S. Clifford Hood.
This application was heard in Chambers, on September 6, 1996, before Flinn, J.A., of the Nova Scotia Court of Appeal, who delivered the following decision on September 9, 1996.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Spiropoulos v. Chagnon et al., (1997) 160 N.S.R.(2d) 397 (CA)
...proceedings pending appeal - Jurisdiction - [See Courts - Topic 2110 ]. Cases Noticed: Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al. (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72; 452 A.P.R. 72 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Saunders et al. v. Oceanus Marine Inc., [1997] 160 N.S.R.(2d) 393; 473 A.P.R. 393 (C.A.), refd ......
-
Oceanus Marine Inc. v. Saunders, (1997) 160 N.S.R.(2d) 393 (CA)
...of the court had not previously been answered - See paragraphs 1 to 11. Cases Noticed: Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al. (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72; 452 A.P.R. 72 (C.A.), refd to. [para. NsC Diesel Power Inc. (Bankrupt), Re (1995), 140 N.S.R.(2d) 279; 399 A.P.R. 279 (C.A.), refd to......
-
Spiropoulos v. Chagnon et al., (1997) 160 N.S.R.(2d) 397 (CA)
...proceedings pending appeal - Jurisdiction - [See Courts - Topic 2110 ]. Cases Noticed: Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al. (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72; 452 A.P.R. 72 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Saunders et al. v. Oceanus Marine Inc., [1997] 160 N.S.R.(2d) 393; 473 A.P.R. 393 (C.A.), refd ......
-
Oceanus Marine Inc. v. Saunders, (1997) 160 N.S.R.(2d) 393 (CA)
...of the court had not previously been answered - See paragraphs 1 to 11. Cases Noticed: Skipper Fisheries Ltd. v. Thorbourne et al. (1996), 154 N.S.R.(2d) 72; 452 A.P.R. 72 (C.A.), refd to. [para. NsC Diesel Power Inc. (Bankrupt), Re (1995), 140 N.S.R.(2d) 279; 399 A.P.R. 279 (C.A.), refd to......