SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194

JudgeHonourable Judge D. Mah
Docket NumberCP901003017
Date23 October 2020
Citation2020 ABPC 194
CourtProvincial Court of Alberta (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...v SRM, [2006] OJ No 1741(Ont Ct J) at para 111; Strobridge v Strobridge, [1994] OJ No 1247 (ONCA) at para 36; SK at para 171; SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194 at para 46; KC v JC, 2022 ABPC 94 at para 25; Cairns v Cairns, 1931 CanLII 471 (ABCA) at paras 39-40; BLS (Re) at paras [73]   ......
  • MB (Re), 2022 ABPC 270
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...ties to each such member of his or her family." [39]           In SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194, in a private guardianship application like the present case, Judge Mah found at paragraph 48 . . . [I]n the case at bar, the two Acts complement o......
  • A Year In Review ' An Act Respecting First Nation, Inuit And Metis Children, Youth And Families
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • December 31, 2020
    ...conflict or inconsistency in question related to when and how the consideration of best interests of the child is to be applied. SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194 The Director of Children's Services in Alberta applied for a Temporary Guardianship order regarding five Indigenous children. The children'......
2 cases
  • JC v KC, 2022 ABKB 707
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 24, 2022
    ...v SRM, [2006] OJ No 1741(Ont Ct J) at para 111; Strobridge v Strobridge, [1994] OJ No 1247 (ONCA) at para 36; SK at para 171; SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194 at para 46; KC v JC, 2022 ABPC 94 at para 25; Cairns v Cairns, 1931 CanLII 471 (ABCA) at paras 39-40; BLS (Re) at paras [73]   ......
  • MB (Re), 2022 ABPC 270
    • Canada
    • Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...ties to each such member of his or her family." [39]           In SL (Re), 2020 ABPC 194, in a private guardianship application like the present case, Judge Mah found at paragraph 48 . . . [I]n the case at bar, the two Acts complement o......
1 firm's commentaries