Smith v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtCourt of Appeal (Canada)
Citation2021 FCA 73
Date15 April 2021
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • E.Z. Automotive Ltd. v Regina (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 12 Agosto 2021
    ...to the legislator’s intent. (Emphasis added) [65]        In Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at paras 47–50, Rivoalen J.A. affirmed that the Huruglica approach remains valid despite the decision in Vavilov. The internal standard......
  • Persaud v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 811
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Junio 2023
    ...of patent unreasonableness (citing Kalkat v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 794 at para 62, and Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at paras 55 and 56). In sum, the final level adjudicator instructs herself that interference with the decision of the initial level adjudicator i......
  • Zak v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 80
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 20 Abril 2021
    ...On issues of law, including the standard of review, we are bound by this Court’s decision in Smith v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 concerning appeals from judicial reviews under a substantially similar legislative regime. Like the Federal Court in the present case and for m......
  • Firsov v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Agosto 2021
    ...of review is “a highly deferential standard that would be difficult hurdle to overcome”: Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at para 55. [77] In other words, the palpable and overriding error standard requires the Adjudicator to defer to the Conduct Authority unless......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • E.Z. Automotive Ltd. v Regina (City),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • 12 Agosto 2021
    ...to the legislator’s intent. (Emphasis added) [65]        In Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at paras 47–50, Rivoalen J.A. affirmed that the Huruglica approach remains valid despite the decision in Vavilov. The internal standard......
  • Persaud v. Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 811
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 8 Junio 2023
    ...of patent unreasonableness (citing Kalkat v Canada (Attorney General), 2017 FC 794 at para 62, and Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at paras 55 and 56). In sum, the final level adjudicator instructs herself that interference with the decision of the initial level adjudicator i......
  • Firsov v. Canada (Attorney General),
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • 25 Agosto 2021
    ...of review is “a highly deferential standard that would be difficult hurdle to overcome”: Smith v Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 at para 55. [77] In other words, the palpable and overriding error standard requires the Adjudicator to defer to the Conduct Authority unless......
  • Zak v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 80
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Canada)
    • 20 Abril 2021
    ...On issues of law, including the standard of review, we are bound by this Court’s decision in Smith v. Canada (Attorney General), 2021 FCA 73 concerning appeals from judicial reviews under a substantially similar legislative regime. Like the Federal Court in the present case and for m......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT