Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789

JudgeW.S. Schlosser
Citation2019 ABQB 789
Date09 October 2019
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number0603 14625
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2020
    ...expert report, though not required by the rule. [at paras 33, 39-40] Defence delay Third party precondition / delay Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 Master Schlosser Defence slow to issue statement of defence in context of changing rule and deadlines. Defence contributed to delay in finalizing......
  • Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 7, 2021
    ...Ltd, 2019 ABCA 276 at para 21 (characterized as the “leading case” on this topic by Master Schlosser in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at para 10), noting that R 4.31 applications do not invite a purely rote analysis and can be approached in different ways, with the purpose of ......
  • Song v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 583
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2020
    ...Defence. Responsibility for the delay during this period was attributed equally between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at paras 6 and 7 [Song]. [45] The law on this point is clear that a party is not entitled to wait indefinitely for a response to a Demand fo......
  • Lofstrom v Radke, 2020 ABQB 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 18, 2020
    ...[116] The final element, whether the court should nonetheless permit the action to continue, was considered in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789. In Song, the plaintiff satisfied the Master that despite the delay, the prejudice to the Crown was somewhat limited and since the case involved harm ......
4 cases
  • Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 7, 2021
    ...Ltd, 2019 ABCA 276 at para 21 (characterized as the “leading case” on this topic by Master Schlosser in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at para 10), noting that R 4.31 applications do not invite a purely rote analysis and can be approached in different ways, with the purpose of ......
  • Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • April 21, 2020
    ...expert report, though not required by the rule. [at paras 33, 39-40] Defence delay Third party precondition / delay Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 Master Schlosser Defence slow to issue statement of defence in context of changing rule and deadlines. Defence contributed to delay in finalizing......
  • Song v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 583
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 5, 2020
    ...Defence. Responsibility for the delay during this period was attributed equally between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at paras 6 and 7 [Song]. [45] The law on this point is clear that a party is not entitled to wait indefinitely for a response to a Demand fo......
  • Lofstrom v Radke, 2020 ABQB 122
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • February 18, 2020
    ...[116] The final element, whether the court should nonetheless permit the action to continue, was considered in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789. In Song, the plaintiff satisfied the Master that despite the delay, the prejudice to the Crown was somewhat limited and since the case involved harm ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT