Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789
Judge | W.S. Schlosser |
Citation | 2019 ABQB 789 |
Date | 09 October 2019 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
Docket Number | 0603 14625 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
...expert report, though not required by the rule. [at paras 33, 39-40] Defence delay Third party precondition / delay Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 Master Schlosser Defence slow to issue statement of defence in context of changing rule and deadlines. Defence contributed to delay in finalizing......
-
Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.,
...Ltd, 2019 ABCA 276 at para 21 (characterized as the “leading case” on this topic by Master Schlosser in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at para 10), noting that R 4.31 applications do not invite a purely rote analysis and can be approached in different ways, with the purpose of ......
-
Song v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 583
...Defence. Responsibility for the delay during this period was attributed equally between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at paras 6 and 7 [Song]. [45] The law on this point is clear that a party is not entitled to wait indefinitely for a response to a Demand fo......
-
Lofstrom v Radke, 2020 ABQB 122
...[116] The final element, whether the court should nonetheless permit the action to continue, was considered in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789. In Song, the plaintiff satisfied the Master that despite the delay, the prejudice to the Crown was somewhat limited and since the case involved harm ......
4 cases
-
Gammage v Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd.,
...Ltd, 2019 ABCA 276 at para 21 (characterized as the “leading case” on this topic by Master Schlosser in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at para 10), noting that R 4.31 applications do not invite a purely rote analysis and can be approached in different ways, with the purpose of ......
-
Fode v Paragon Gaming EC Company, 2020 ABQB 266
...expert report, though not required by the rule. [at paras 33, 39-40] Defence delay Third party precondition / delay Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 Master Schlosser Defence slow to issue statement of defence in context of changing rule and deadlines. Defence contributed to delay in finalizing......
-
Song v Alberta, 2020 ABQB 583
...Defence. Responsibility for the delay during this period was attributed equally between the Plaintiff and the Defendant: Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789 at paras 6 and 7 [Song]. [45] The law on this point is clear that a party is not entitled to wait indefinitely for a response to a Demand fo......
-
Lofstrom v Radke, 2020 ABQB 122
...[116] The final element, whether the court should nonetheless permit the action to continue, was considered in Song v Alberta, 2019 ABQB 789. In Song, the plaintiff satisfied the Master that despite the delay, the prejudice to the Crown was somewhat limited and since the case involved harm ......