Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3
Jurisdiction | Nova Scotia |
Judge | David P.S. Farrar |
Citation | 2019 NSCA 3 |
Docket Number | CA 478929 |
Court | Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada) |
Date | 18 January 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Wolfson v Wolfson,
...construction which will give effect to that purpose”: para 21, Clarke v Clarke, supra. Further, in Sparks v Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, Farrar, JA reviewed basic principles of statutory interpretation: [27] The Supreme Court of Canada and this Court have affirmed ......
-
Doctors Nova Scotia v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 22
...Analysis [34] The proper approach to statutory interpretation can be found in the recent decision of this Court in Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3: [27] The Supreme Court of Canada and this Court have affirmed the modern principle of statutory interpretation in many cases that “[t]he words o......
-
Sears v. Top O’ the Mountain Apartments Limited,
...of the Act, and the intention of Parliament” (Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, at para. 21). In Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, the Court of Appeal noted that applying the modern principle typically involves answering three [28] This Court typically asks three question......
-
Landry v. Chisholm,
...benefits and Section B benefits [74] The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, the Court was clear that CPP disability benefits are to be deducted from future income loss. [75] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
10 cases
-
Wolfson v Wolfson,
...construction which will give effect to that purpose”: para 21, Clarke v Clarke, supra. Further, in Sparks v Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, Farrar, JA reviewed basic principles of statutory interpretation: [27] The Supreme Court of Canada and this Court have affirmed ......
-
Doctors Nova Scotia v. Nova Scotia (Attorney General), 2020 NSCA 22
...Analysis [34] The proper approach to statutory interpretation can be found in the recent decision of this Court in Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3: [27] The Supreme Court of Canada and this Court have affirmed the modern principle of statutory interpretation in many cases that “[t]he words o......
-
Sears v. Top O’ the Mountain Apartments Limited,
...of the Act, and the intention of Parliament” (Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re), [1998] 1 S.C.R. 27, at para. 21). In Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, the Court of Appeal noted that applying the modern principle typically involves answering three [28] This Court typically asks three question......
-
Landry v. Chisholm,
...benefits and Section B benefits [74] The Nova Scotia Court of Appeal in Sparks v. Holland, 2019 NSCA 3, the Court was clear that CPP disability benefits are to be deducted from future income loss. [75] ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
Atlantic Canada Case Law Updates - June 2020
...to an unreasonable level." The Estate also argued that Justice Murray had made his finding without the benefit of Sparks v Holland, 2019 NSCA 3. Sparks, supra, the Court found that all CPP disability benefits (past and future) must be deducted from the plaintiff's damages for income loss an......
-
CPP Disability Payments Deductible From Future Loss
...Nova Scotia Court of Appeal overturned a motion decision in Sparks v Holland, 2019 NSCA 3 ("Sparks"), holding that Canadian Pension Program ("CPP") disability payments are deductible from future loss of income and earning The respondent, Catherine Holland, was involved in a motor vehicle ac......