SSE Holdings, LLC v. Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
Citation | 2020 FC 983 |
Date | 05 October 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
Export Development Canada v. Suncor Energy Inc., 2023 FC 1050
...to cross-examine is not an admission: Exeter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 260 at para 9; SSE Holdings, LLC v Le Chic Shack Inc, 2020 FC 983 at paras 57-58. EDC did not cross-examine Mr. Munoz because his testimony is straightforward and [50] I agree with EDC that Mr. Michielsen......
-
Bunzl IP Holdings, LLC v. Winnipeg Pants & Sportswear Mfg Ltd., 2022 FC 813
...is unreliable and not credible, particularly in the absence of contradictory evidence: see, e.g., SSE Holdings, LLC v Le Chic Shack Inc, 2020 FC 983 at para 58, citing Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC v Manoukian, 2013 FC 193 at para 37. Indeed, the first paragraph of WPS’s m......
-
Canadian Standards Association v. Pharma Plastic Industries Inc., 2021 FC 136
...settlement agreement reached in the course of a trademark infringement action in this Court (SSE Holdings, LCC v Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983 at para 60 (SSE Holdings)): [60] It is now trite law that the Court may decide contractual issues that are incidental to a matter that is otherwis......
-
Southern Railway of British Columbia Limited v. Vancouver Fraser Port Authority, 2023 FC 1105
... [51] SRY argues that it was not obliged to cross-examine and relies on the decision in SSE Holdings, LLC v. Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983 at paragraph [58] […] However, a failure to cross-examine does not mean that the Court has to accept a witness’ evidence without a......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Export Development Canada v. Suncor Energy Inc., 2023 FC 1050
...to cross-examine is not an admission: Exeter v Canada (Attorney General), 2015 FCA 260 at para 9; SSE Holdings, LLC v Le Chic Shack Inc, 2020 FC 983 at paras 57-58. EDC did not cross-examine Mr. Munoz because his testimony is straightforward and [50] I agree with EDC that Mr. Michielsen......
-
Bunzl IP Holdings, LLC v. Winnipeg Pants & Sportswear Mfg Ltd., 2022 FC 813
...is unreliable and not credible, particularly in the absence of contradictory evidence: see, e.g., SSE Holdings, LLC v Le Chic Shack Inc, 2020 FC 983 at para 58, citing Harley-Davidson Motor Company Group, LLC v Manoukian, 2013 FC 193 at para 37. Indeed, the first paragraph of WPS’s m......
-
Canadian Standards Association v. Pharma Plastic Industries Inc., 2021 FC 136
...settlement agreement reached in the course of a trademark infringement action in this Court (SSE Holdings, LCC v Le Chic Shack Inc., 2020 FC 983 at para 60 (SSE Holdings)): [60] It is now trite law that the Court may decide contractual issues that are incidental to a matter that is otherwis......
-
GU v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...cross-examine, however, does not improve the sufficiency of the evidence. Justice Denis Gascon in SSE Holdings, LLC v Le Chic Shack Inc, 2020 FC 983 at para 58 states the following: I accept that a party’s failure to cross-examine a witness may prevent that party from trying to impug......
Request a trial to view additional results