Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeSlatter,Antonio,Feehan
Citation2019 ABCA 274
Docket Number1901-0046-AC
Date10 July 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
34 practice notes
  • Savoie v. Lambert
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...inference against a party that fails or refuses to bring forward evidence on a key point: Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at para 87 (Slatter JA in dissent). It is within a court’s discretion, with the following circumstances being particularly significant: (1) whe......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 28, 2025
    ...O.R. (2d) 65 (C.A.), Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30, Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 274 Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company,2025 ONCA 719 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Class Proceedings, Certification, Orders, Interpretation, Courts of ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...af’d (1977), 16 OR (2d) 221, 78 DLR (3d) 125 (CA) ...................................471 Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 ................... 689–91 Stirrett v Cheema, 2020 ONCA 288, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2020] SCCA No 229 ......................................
  • McDonald v Sproule Management GP Limited
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 17, 2023
    ...2018 ABQB 2 at paras 182, 192-93, 204; Howard v Sandau, 2008 ABQB 34 at paras 39 and 44; Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at paras 87-88 (Slatter JA in dissent); Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc v HB Construction Company Ltd, 2022 NBCA 39 at para 302; R v AM, ......
  • Get Started for Free
22 cases
  • Esfahani v Samimi, 2022 ABKB 795
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 5, 2022
    ...adverse inference: Chateauvert at para 182; Howard v Sandau, 2008 ABQB 34 at paras 39 and 44; Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at paras 87-88 (Slatter JA in dissent); Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan Inc v HB Construction Company Ltd, 2022 NBCA 39 at para 302; R v......
  • KY v Bahler
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 8, 2023
    ...the failure to do so, absent a good explanation, may lead to an adverse inference. See also Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at para 87; Lupuliak v Condominium Plan No 8211689, 2022 ABQB 65, Feasby J at paras 49 and 51 (“An adverse inference must be reasonabl......
  • ATCO Energy Solutions Ltd v Energy Dynamics Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 26, 2024
    ...such an inference: Hudson King v Lightstream Resources Ltd, 2020 ABQB 149 at para 334 citing Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at para 51 and Pfeifer v Westfair Foods Ltd, 2004 ABCA 422 at para 20. Accordingly, I infer that NGC was not negligent and, therefore, there......
  • Savoie v Lambert
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • July 11, 2024
    ...inference against a party that fails or refuses to bring forward evidence on a key point: Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 at para 87 (Slatter JA in dissent). It is within a court's discretion, with the following circumstances being particularly significant: (1) whe......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 20 ' 24, 2025)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 28, 2025
    ...O.R. (2d) 65 (C.A.), Paragon Development Corporation v. Sonka Properties Inc., 2011 ONCA 30, Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd., 2019 ABCA 274 Aizic v. Natcan Trust Company,2025 ONCA 719 Keywords: Civil Procedure, Class Proceedings, Certification, Orders, Interpretation, Courts of ......
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...af’d (1977), 16 OR (2d) 221, 78 DLR (3d) 125 (CA) ...................................471 Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd, 2019 ABCA 274 ................... 689–91 Stirrett v Cheema, 2020 ONCA 288, leave to appeal to SCC refused, [2020] SCCA No 229 ......................................
  • Rectification
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Equitable Remedies - Third edition
    • November 18, 2023
    ...in the United Kingdom: see Riverlate Properties Ltd v Paul (1974), [1975] Ch 133 (CA). 42 Stikeman Elliott LLP v 2083878 Alberta Ltd , 2019 ABCA 274 [ Stikeman Elliott ]. THE LAW OF EQUITABLE REMEDIES 690 it eventuated, no taxes had to be paid. However, when it came to remit the funds in es......