Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)

CourtCourt of Appeal (Alberta)
JudgeWakeling
Judgment Date17 May 2023
Citation2023 ABCA 163
Docket Number2201-0144AC
Date17 May 2023

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 1, 2023
    ...appeal judge to have it rescinded, confirmed, amended or enforced”). [32] Stubicar v, Calgary Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2023 ABCA 163. [33] Application filed June 2, 2023, page [34] Memorandum of Argument filed June 2, 2023, ¶ 25. [35] Applicant’s Memorandum of Argument file......
  • Stubicar v JEMM Sunnyside Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 14, 2023
    ...Justice Wakeling was biased. That application was dismissed as “baseless”: Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 163. Ljubica then challenged the CMO's settlement of the terms of the costs order. That application was dismissed as well: Stubicar v Calgary (......
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 9, 2023
    ...The applicant’s request for permission to appeal this decision was denied: Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 163. The applicant then submitted the Case Management Officer was not empowered to settle the terms of the order arising from Wakeling JA’s cos......
3 cases
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • September 1, 2023
    ...appeal judge to have it rescinded, confirmed, amended or enforced”). [32] Stubicar v, Calgary Subdivision and Development Appeal Board, 2023 ABCA 163. [33] Application filed June 2, 2023, page [34] Memorandum of Argument filed June 2, 2023, ¶ 25. [35] Applicant’s Memorandum of Argument file......
  • Stubicar v JEMM Sunnyside Ltd
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 14, 2023
    ...Justice Wakeling was biased. That application was dismissed as “baseless”: Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 163. Ljubica then challenged the CMO's settlement of the terms of the costs order. That application was dismissed as well: Stubicar v Calgary (......
  • Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • November 9, 2023
    ...The applicant’s request for permission to appeal this decision was denied: Stubicar v Calgary (Subdivision and Development Appeal Board), 2023 ABCA 163. The applicant then submitted the Case Management Officer was not empowered to settle the terms of the order arising from Wakeling JA’s cos......