Studio Pyramid Inc. v. Raffan

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeFAVREAU J.
Docket NumberCV-1800605661
Date09 March 2020
Citation2020 ONSC 1476
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • Direct General Partner Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...judge correctly identified the legal criteria that governed the exercise of his discretion on this issue, citing Studio Pyramid v Raffan, 2020 ONSC 1476 [ Studio Pyramid], and Winkler v Hendley, 2021 FC 498, 184 CPR (4th) 1 [ Winkler], he failed to turn his mind to whether the evidence cont......
  • Duncan v. Buckles
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...signing, entry and filing when the Court returns to regular operations. FAVREAU J. RELEASED: May 25, 2020 CITATION: Duncan v. Buckles, 2020 ONSC 1476 COURT FILE NO.: DATE: 20200525 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TINA JAYNE DUNCAN Plaintiffs – and – MARNEE BUCKLES AND ROBE......
  • CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DIRECT GENERAL PARTNER CORPORATION
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...The defendants opposed the late filing of Mr. Olson’s affidavit, relying upon Studio Pyramid Inc. v Raffan, 2020 ONSC 1476 [Studio Pyramid]. In that case, the plaintiff sued the defendant for fraudulent conveyance, alleging the defendant had transferred her interest in a property to ......
3 cases
  • Direct General Partner Corporation v Canadian Pacific Railway Company,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • March 11, 2025
    ...judge correctly identified the legal criteria that governed the exercise of his discretion on this issue, citing Studio Pyramid v Raffan, 2020 ONSC 1476 [ Studio Pyramid], and Winkler v Hendley, 2021 FC 498, 184 CPR (4th) 1 [ Winkler], he failed to turn his mind to whether the evidence cont......
  • Duncan v. Buckles,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 25, 2020
    ...signing, entry and filing when the Court returns to regular operations. FAVREAU J. RELEASED: May 25, 2020 CITATION: Duncan v. Buckles, 2020 ONSC 1476 COURT FILE NO.: DATE: 20200525 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N : TINA JAYNE DUNCAN Plaintiffs – and – MARNEE BUCKLES AND ROBE......
  • CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DIRECT GENERAL PARTNER CORPORATION,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • January 13, 2023
    ...The defendants opposed the late filing of Mr. Olson’s affidavit, relying upon Studio Pyramid Inc. v Raffan, 2020 ONSC 1476 [Studio Pyramid]. In that case, the plaintiff sued the defendant for fraudulent conveyance, alleging the defendant had transferred her interest in a property to ......