Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FCA 202 |
| Date | 23 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...the SDM was not bound by the Immigration Division’s inadmissibility finding: Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at paras 33-35. Nonetheless, the SDM reached the same conclusion as did the ID on inadmissibility and considered its nature and severity in d......
-
Banovic v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...37(1)(b) of the IRPA (Naredo at paras 70–71; see also Guzelian at paras 1, 18, 20–21; Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 at para 31; Ahmed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 791 at paras 68–74; Kumarasekaram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), ......
-
Naredo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...decision was reasonable based on the evidence before the officer. [71] In addition, in Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 [Subramaniam], when considering the difference between when inadmissibility arises in the context of PRRA applications as compared to when ......
-
Arif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...no reason to depart from the reasonableness standard followed in previous case law: Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at para 17; Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina], at para 16. [25] A court performing a reasonableness rev......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...the SDM was not bound by the Immigration Division’s inadmissibility finding: Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at paras 33-35. Nonetheless, the SDM reached the same conclusion as did the ID on inadmissibility and considered its nature and severity in d......
-
Banovic v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...37(1)(b) of the IRPA (Naredo at paras 70–71; see also Guzelian at paras 1, 18, 20–21; Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 at para 31; Ahmed v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 791 at paras 68–74; Kumarasekaram v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), ......
-
Naredo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...decision was reasonable based on the evidence before the officer. [71] In addition, in Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 [Subramaniam], when considering the difference between when inadmissibility arises in the context of PRRA applications as compared to when ......
-
Arif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...no reason to depart from the reasonableness standard followed in previous case law: Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at para 17; Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina], at para 16. [25] A court performing a reasonableness rev......
Get Started for Free