Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Canada) |
| Citation | 2020 FCA 202 |
| Date | 23 November 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1028
...the SDM was not bound by the Immigration Division’s inadmissibility finding: Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at paras 33-35. Nonetheless, the SDM reached the same conclusion as did the ID on inadmissibility and considered its nature and severity in d......
-
Naredo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1543
...decision was reasonable based on the evidence before the officer. [71] In addition, in Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 [Subramaniam], when considering the difference between when inadmissibility arises in the context of PRRA applications as compared to when ......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Asphall, 2023 FC 1090
...Tapambwa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FCA 34 at paras 47-49 and Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 at paras 23-25. Parliament gave the responsibility of overturning inadmissibility findings to the Federal Court. Therefore, according to the Minis......
-
Arif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...no reason to depart from the reasonableness standard followed in previous case law: Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at para 17; Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina], at para 16. [25] A court performing a reasonableness rev......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
A.R. v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1028
...the SDM was not bound by the Immigration Division’s inadmissibility finding: Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at paras 33-35. Nonetheless, the SDM reached the same conclusion as did the ID on inadmissibility and considered its nature and severity in d......
-
Naredo v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 1543
...decision was reasonable based on the evidence before the officer. [71] In addition, in Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 [Subramaniam], when considering the difference between when inadmissibility arises in the context of PRRA applications as compared to when ......
-
Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) v. Asphall, 2023 FC 1090
...Tapambwa v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2019 FCA 34 at paras 47-49 and Subramaniam v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202 at paras 23-25. Parliament gave the responsibility of overturning inadmissibility findings to the Federal Court. Therefore, according to the Minis......
-
Arif v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...no reason to depart from the reasonableness standard followed in previous case law: Subramaniam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FCA 202, at para 17; Jystina v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2020 FC 912 [Jystina], at para 16. [25] A court performing a reasonableness rev......
Request a trial to view additional results