Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeStrathy ,Pardu , Brown
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,PRACTICE,CRIMINAL LAW
Citation2017 ONCA 41
Date18 January 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 March 2022
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 670; R. v. Suzack (2000), 30 C.R. (5th) 346 (Ont. C.A.), Wade v. C.N.R., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1064, Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, Lang v. McKenna (2000), 135 O.A.C. 304, Jarbeau v. McLean, 2017 ONCA 115, Teskey v. TTC (2003), 3 C.P.C. (6th) 181, Salter v. Hirst, 2010 ONSC 344......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 March 2022
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 670; R. v. Suzack (2000), 30 C.R. (5th) 346 (Ont. C.A.), Wade v. C.N.R., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1064, Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, Lang v. McKenna (2000), 135 O.A.C. 304, Jarbeau v. McLean, 2017 ONCA 115, Teskey v. TTC (2003), 3 C.P.C. (6th) 181, Salter v. Hirst, 2010 ONSC 344......
  • Sean Omar Henry v. Dr. Marshall Zaitlen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 13 January 2022
    ...[24]        The Defendant relied on the Court of Appeal’s decision in Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, 410 D.L.R. (4th) 538, decided several months before the Court of Appeal’s decision in Sacks (ONCA), where the Court of Appeal adopted, at ......
  • Cheung v. Samra, 2020 ONSC 4904
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 27 August 2020
    ...and S. RENO Respondents/Appellants on Cross-Appeal REASONS FOR DECISION D.L. Corbett J. Released: August 27, 2020 [1] Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, at para. [2] “Apgar” stands for appearance, pulse, grimace, activity and respiration. Each metric is scored on a scale of 0-2 and the score......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
  • Sean Omar Henry v. Dr. Marshall Zaitlen,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 13 January 2022
    ...[24]        The Defendant relied on the Court of Appeal’s decision in Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, 410 D.L.R. (4th) 538, decided several months before the Court of Appeal’s decision in Sacks (ONCA), where the Court of Appeal adopted, at ......
  • Cheung v. Samra, 2020 ONSC 4904
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 27 August 2020
    ...and S. RENO Respondents/Appellants on Cross-Appeal REASONS FOR DECISION D.L. Corbett J. Released: August 27, 2020 [1] Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, at para. [2] “Apgar” stands for appearance, pulse, grimace, activity and respiration. Each metric is scored on a scale of 0-2 and the score......
  • Sacks v. Ross, 2017 ONCA 773
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 5 October 2017
    ...the issues of fact, the relevant legal principles, how the facts relate to the law, and the positions of the parties: Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, at para. 83. [94]The appellants advanced overlapping arguments on the appeal. They contest the adequacy of the wording of the jury question......
  • Little v. Floyd Sinton Limited, 2019 ONCA 865
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 4 November 2019
    ...[18] It is well established that a jury charge must be considered against the entire charge and the trial as a whole: Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, 410 D.L.R. (4th) 538, at paras. 82-83; R. v. Daley, 2007 SCC 53, [2007] 3 S.C.R. 523, at paras. 30-31. The question on appellate review is ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 March 2022
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 670; R. v. Suzack (2000), 30 C.R. (5th) 346 (Ont. C.A.), Wade v. C.N.R., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1064, Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, Lang v. McKenna (2000), 135 O.A.C. 304, Jarbeau v. McLean, 2017 ONCA 115, Teskey v. TTC (2003), 3 C.P.C. (6th) 181, Salter v. Hirst, 2010 ONSC 344......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 7 ' 11, 2022)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 16 March 2022
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 670; R. v. Suzack (2000), 30 C.R. (5th) 346 (Ont. C.A.), Wade v. C.N.R., [1978] 1 S.C.R. 1064, Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, Lang v. McKenna (2000), 135 O.A.C. 304, Jarbeau v. McLean, 2017 ONCA 115, Teskey v. TTC (2003), 3 C.P.C. (6th) 181, Salter v. Hirst, 2010 ONSC 344......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (January 16 – 20, 2017
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 27 January 2017
    ... Civil Procedure, Rule 26.01 , Amending Pleadings, Actual Prejudice, Presumed Prejudice, Costs, Substantial Indemnity Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41 Keywords: Torts, Negligence, Medical Malpractice, Juries, Charge to Jury, Questions for Jury, Polling of Jury Independence Plaza 1 Associate......
  • Jury Questions: When To Ask For Reasons - Case Study: Cheung v. Samra 2020 ONSC 4904
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 28 September 2020
    ...[1988] 1 S.C.R. 670, and R. v. Suzack, [2000] O.J. No. 100 (C.A.). 2. [1995] 3 S.C.R. 674, at para. 53. 3. Ibid. 4. Surujdeo v. Melady, 2017 ONCA 41, at 5. Poonwasee v. Plaza, 2018 CarswellOnt 9928, 2018 ONSC 3797 (Ont. S.C.J.) at para 17. 6. 2020 ONSC 4904. The content of this article is i......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT