Sutton v. Sutton, (1985) 33 Man.R.(2d) 78 (QBFD)
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada) |
Case Date | January 18, 1985 |
Jurisdiction | Manitoba |
Citations | (1985), 33 Man.R.(2d) 78 (QBFD) |
Sutton v. Sutton (1985), 33 Man.R.(2d) 78 (QBFD)
MLB headnote and full text
Sutton v. Sutton
(Suit No. 139/82 F.M.)
Indexed As: Sutton v. Sutton
Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench
Family Division
Hamilton, A.C.J.
January 18, 1985.
Summary:
The issue in this case concerned the validity under the Queen's Bench Rules of affidavits filed by the applicant and respondent.
The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, held that neither affidavit complied with the Rules and ordered that both be removed from the record, with leave given to replace them with proper affidavits.
Practice - Topic 1609
Pleadings - The defence - General principles - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, stated that generally a statement of defence should answer each paragraph in the statement of claim and set forth what is admitted or denied - See paragraph 7.
Practice - Topic 3603
Evidence - Affidavits - Contents of - The Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, held that an affidavit, filed in reply to the opposite party's affidavit, should not be drafted in the form of a statement of defence - Neither should the affidavit be argumentative - The court held that an affidavit should only recite facts - See paragraphs 7, 9 to 10.
Counsel:
Gail P. Perry, for the applicant;
Dorothy E. McDonald, for the respondent.
This matter was heard before Hamilton, A.C.J., of the Manitoba Court of Queen's Bench, Family Division, whose decision was delivered on January 18, 1985.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Table of Cases
...BCJ No 342 (SC)..................................................................................................373 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78, [1985] MJ No 314 (QB)...................................................................... 586 Sutton v Sutton, [1999] BCJ No 1933 ......
-
Table of cases
...BCJ No 342 (SC) ................................................................................................ 356 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78, [1985] MJ No 314 (QB) ...................................................................... 556 Sutton v Sutton, [1999] BCJ No 1933......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...deponent has personal knowledge of, although hearsay evidence may be included under Rule 56A.20(2) 36 37 38 39 40 41 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78 (QB); Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (portions of affidavit struck out). Savoie v Savoie (1989), 101 NBR (2d) 431 (QB)......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...RFL (4th) 79 (Alta QB). 33 Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (QB). 34 (1987), 49 Man R (2d) 245 (QB). 35 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78 (QB); Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (QB) (portions of aidavit struck out). 36 Savoie v Savoie (1989), 101 NBR (2d) 43......
-
Eblie v. Yankoski, (2007) 216 Man.R.(2d) 172 (QBFD)
...refd to. [para. 13]. Bouteiller v. Bouteiller (1997), 116 Man.R.(2d) 153 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. 14]. Sutton v. Sutton (1985), 33 Man.R.(2d) 78 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. Authors and Works Noticed: Law Society of Manitoba, Code of Professional Conduct, c. 9 [para. 21]. Coun......
-
Tymkin v. Ewatski et al.,
...paragraph 18. Cases Noticed: Schnell v. Schnell and Crosbie (1983), 25 Man.R.(2d) 151 (Q.B.), refd to. [para. 8]. Sutton v. Sutton (1985), 33 Man.R.(2d) 78 (Q.B. Fam. Div.), refd to. [para. Saan Stores Ltd. v. Reebok Canada Inc. et al. (1996), 111 Man.R.(2d) 1 (Q.B. Master), refd to. [para.......
-
Palansky v. Palansky, (1989) 60 Man.R.(2d) 141 (QBFD)
...above]. Practice - Topic 5204 Trials - Severance of issues - [See Family Law - Topic 4124 above]. Cases Noticed: Sutton v. Sutton (1985), 33 Man.R.(2d) 78, appld. [para. McDonald v. Sanderson, [1923] 3 W.W. R. 237 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 18]. Peters v. Peters, [1970] 2 O.R. 246 (S.C.),......
-
Evidence; procedure; costs
...RFL (4th) 79 (Alta QB). 33 Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (QB). 34 (1987), 49 Man R (2d) 245 (QB). 35 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78 (QB); Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (QB) (portions of aidavit struck out). 36 Savoie v Savoie (1989), 101 NBR (2d) 43......
-
Evidence; Procedure; Costs
...deponent has personal knowledge of, although hearsay evidence may be included under Rule 56A.20(2) 36 37 38 39 40 41 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78 (QB); Palansky v Palansky (1989), 60 Man R (2d) 141 (portions of affidavit struck out). Savoie v Savoie (1989), 101 NBR (2d) 431 (QB)......
-
Table of Cases
...BCJ No 342 (SC)..................................................................................................373 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78, [1985] MJ No 314 (QB)...................................................................... 586 Sutton v Sutton, [1999] BCJ No 1933 ......
-
Table of cases
...BCJ No 342 (SC) ................................................................................................ 356 Sutton v Sutton (1985), 33 Man R (2d) 78, [1985] MJ No 314 (QB) ...................................................................... 556 Sutton v Sutton, [1999] BCJ No 1933......