Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Limited, 2018 BCCA 122

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Mr. Justice Lowry,The Honourable Madam Justice Garson,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon
Citation2018 BCCA 122
Date05 April 2018
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
Docket NumberCA44800
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • D.A.B. v. C.A.S., 2020 BCSC 807
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 d3 Junho d3 2020
    ...adapt to changing circumstances. These foundational principles were recently reiterated in Swiss Reinsurance Co. v. Camarin Ltd., 2018 BCCA 122 at paras. 22 and [33] Granting leave to amend pleadings is a highly discretionary decision. Ultimately, the question is whether it is just and conv......
  • Rawlins v. Rawlins Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 25 d5 Fevereiro d5 2022
    ...the interests of justice: Century Services Inc. v. LeRoy, 2015 BCCA 120 at para. 10; Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Ltd., 2018 BCCA 122 at paras. 21-23; Teal Cedar Products (1977) Ltd. v. Dale Intermediaries Ltd., 1996 CanLII 3033 at paras. 36-38 and 45, 19 B.C.L.R. (3d......
  • Kostanski v. Batist, 2020 BCSC 674
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 d4 Abril d4 2020
    ...Mr. Kostanski submits the amendments do not amount to a new cause of action citing Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Limited, 2018 BCCA 122, and Taylor v. Blenz The Canadian Coffee Company Ltd., 2019 BCSC 906. In Taylor, Warren J. summarized the approach to applications to amend whe......
  • Wu v. Ma,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 d3 Outubro d3 2022
    ...at para. 59, Wilson J. wrote: [59]      In Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Limited, 2018 BCCA 122, the Court of Appeal considered whether proposed amendments that detailed a claim for failure to warn constituted a new cause of action or whet......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • D.A.B. v. C.A.S., 2020 BCSC 807
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 3 d3 Junho d3 2020
    ...adapt to changing circumstances. These foundational principles were recently reiterated in Swiss Reinsurance Co. v. Camarin Ltd., 2018 BCCA 122 at paras. 22 and [33] Granting leave to amend pleadings is a highly discretionary decision. Ultimately, the question is whether it is just and conv......
  • Rawlins v. Rawlins Estate,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 25 d5 Fevereiro d5 2022
    ...the interests of justice: Century Services Inc. v. LeRoy, 2015 BCCA 120 at para. 10; Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Ltd., 2018 BCCA 122 at paras. 21-23; Teal Cedar Products (1977) Ltd. v. Dale Intermediaries Ltd., 1996 CanLII 3033 at paras. 36-38 and 45, 19 B.C.L.R. (3d......
  • Wu v. Ma,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 d3 Outubro d3 2022
    ...at para. 59, Wilson J. wrote: [59]      In Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Limited, 2018 BCCA 122, the Court of Appeal considered whether proposed amendments that detailed a claim for failure to warn constituted a new cause of action or whet......
  • Blueberry River First Nation v. Laird, 2020 BCCA 76
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • 2 d1 Março d1 2020
    ...The question of whether an amendment raises a new cause of action is a question of law: Swiss Reinsurance Company v. Camarin Limited, 2018 BCCA 122 at para. [21] The appellants argued before the chambers judge that it was open to him to exercise the discretion described in Teal Cedar Produc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT