Swist v. MEG Energy Corp., 2021 FC 10
Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
Citation | 2021 FC 10 |
Date | 20 January 2021 |
Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
AbbVie Corporation v. Jamp Pharma Corporation, 2023 FC 1520
...Inc, 2014 FC 699 [Alcon Canada]; Eli Lilly Canada Inc v Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC, 2020 FC 816 [Eli Lilly 2020]; Swist v MEG Energy Corp, 2021 FC 10. [159] In contrast, AbbVie argues that, where the disclosure broadly includes or encompasses the claimed invention, without necessarily planti......
-
Swist v. Meg Energy Corp., 2022 FCA 118
...phase of the proceeding. [2] In the trial of the liability phase, which included eight days of expert and fact evidence, the Federal Court (2021 FC 10, Fothergill J.) found no infringement by MEG. It also granted MEG’s counterclaim, finding claims 1 to 8 of the 746 patent invalid for......
-
Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms MEG Energy Does Not Infringe An Invalid Patent
...been ordered to pay $537,190.76 into Court as security for costs. Footnotes 1. 2022 FCA 118 ["Swist"]. 2. Swist v. MEG Energy Corp., 2021 FC 10. 3. Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Canada Ltd., 2011 FCA 228 at paras. 21-35. 4. Swist at para. 22. 5. Swist at para. 62, citing 2015 FCA 115. 6. Swist......
-
Promise Me No Promises? The Five-year Anniversary Of The Supreme Court's AstraZeneca Decision
...Hannah Im, Ayushi Thakur, and Justin Kim for their assistance in gathering much of the data cited in this article. 25. Swist v MEG Energy, 2021 FC 10. 26. Aux Sable Liquid Products v JL Energy Transportation, 2019 FC 581 [Aux 27. Safe Gaming System v Atlantic Lottery Corporation, 2018 FC 54......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
Swist v. Meg Energy Corp., 2022 FCA 118
...phase of the proceeding. [2] In the trial of the liability phase, which included eight days of expert and fact evidence, the Federal Court (2021 FC 10, Fothergill J.) found no infringement by MEG. It also granted MEG’s counterclaim, finding claims 1 to 8 of the 746 patent invalid for......
-
Swist v. Meg Energy Corp., 2021 FC 198
...[MEG] by Jason Swist and Crude Solutions Ltd [collectively Swist] as a result of this Court’s judgment in Swist v MEG Energy Corp, 2021 FC 10 [Swist]. [2] This Court held in Swist that Canadian Patent 2,800,746 [746 Patent], titled “Pressure Assisted Oil Recovery”, is n......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court Of Appeal Confirms MEG Energy Does Not Infringe An Invalid Patent
...been ordered to pay $537,190.76 into Court as security for costs. Footnotes 1. 2022 FCA 118 ["Swist"]. 2. Swist v. MEG Energy Corp., 2021 FC 10. 3. Corlac Inc. v. Weatherford Canada Ltd., 2011 FCA 228 at paras. 21-35. 4. Swist at para. 22. 5. Swist at para. 62, citing 2015 FCA 115. 6. Swist......
-
Promise Me No Promises? The Five-year Anniversary Of The Supreme Court's AstraZeneca Decision
...Hannah Im, Ayushi Thakur, and Justin Kim for their assistance in gathering much of the data cited in this article. 25. Swist v MEG Energy, 2021 FC 10. 26. Aux Sable Liquid Products v JL Energy Transportation, 2019 FC 581 [Aux 27. Safe Gaming System v Atlantic Lottery Corporation, 2018 FC 54......
-
A Pair Of SAGD Cases Highlight The Application Of Purposive Patent Claims Construction: Swist v MEG Energy Corp And Betser-Zilevitch v PetroChina Canada Ltd
...went to trial on all issues, it seems these decisive construction issues may have been appropriate for summary adjudication. Footnotes 1 2021 FC 10. 2 Interestingly, the defendant's counterclaim for invalidity based on obviousness was dismissed, notwithstanding the judge had already found t......