Table of cases

• Author: Steve Coughlan - Glen Luther
• Profession: Professor, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University - Associate Professor, College of Law, Saskatchewan
• Pages: 325-343

325

TABLE OF CASES

Banyasz v. K-Mart Canada Ltd. (1986), 57 O.R. (2d) 445, 33 D.L.R.

(4th) 474, [1986] O.J. No. 1244 (Div. Ct.) ..............................................222

Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416, 99 D.L.R. (4th) 350, 1993

CanLI I 154 .........................................................................................7 7, 78

Briggs v. Laviolette (1994), 21 C.C.L.T. (2d) 105, [1994] B.C.J.

No. 1646 (S.C.) .......................................................................................223

Brown v. Durham (Regional Municipa lity) Police Force (1998),

43 O.R. (3d) 223, 131 C.C.C. (3d) 1, [1998] O.J. No. 5274

(C. A.) .......................................................................... 36, 62, 112, 141, 258

Campbell v. Edmonton (City) Police Service (1985), 66 A.R. 222,

[1986] 2 W.W.R. 444, [1985] A.J. No. 538 (C.A.) .....................................35

Canada (Combines Investigation Act Director of Investigation &

Research) v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 55 A.R. 291,

[1984] S.C.J. No. 36 .....................................................15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77

Canada v. Galbraith, 20 01 BCSC 675 ...........................................................164

Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54

D.L.R. (2d) 600, [1965] S.C.J. No. 33 .....................................................165

Chartier v. Greaves, [2001] O.T.C. 121, 103 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1054,

[2001] O.J. No. 634 (S.C.J.) ......................................................................28

Chartier v. Quebec (A.G.), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 474, 104 D.L.R. (3d)

321, [1979] S.C.J. No. 56 ..........................................................................79

Christie v. Leachi nsky, [1947] 1 All E.R. 567, [1947] A.C. 573,

[1947] UKHL 2 .....................................................................34, 35, 262–64

Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 53 C.C.C. (3d) 257,

[1990] S.C.J. No. 10 ......................................................................47, 48, 49

DETENTION AND AR REST326

Cluett v. R., [1985] 2 S.C.R. 216, 21 D.L.R. (4th) 306, [1985] S.C.J.

No. 54 ................................................................................................. 26, 27

Crampton v. Walton, 2005 ABCA 81 ..................................................26, 27, 28

Dallison v. Caffery, [1964] 3 W.L.R. 38 (C.A.) .............................................197

Dedman v. The Queen. See R. v. Dedman

Dendekker v. F.W. Woolworth Co., [1975] 3 W.W.R. 429 (Alta. S.C.) ..........221

Downing v. Capel (1867), L.R. 2 C.P. 461 ....................................................218

Dumbell v. Roberts, [1944] 1 All E.R. 326 (C.A.) ........................................217

Eccles v. Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, 50 D.L.R. (3d) 753,

[1974] S.C.J. No. 123 ................................................12, 26, 38, 78, 79, 138

Eldridge v. British Columbia (A.G.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624, 151

D.L.R. (4th) 577, [1997] S.C.J. No. 86 ......................................................71

Ell v. Alberta, 2003 SCC 35 ..........................................................................158

Ex parte Chung (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 497, [1975] 5 W.W.R.

561, [1975] B.C.J. No. 1077 (S.C.), aff’d (1976), 26 C.C.C.

(2d) 4 97 (B.C.C .A.) ................................................................................17 5

Fletcher v. Collins, [1968] 2 O.R. 618, 70 D.L.R. (2d) 183, [1968]

O.J. No. 1206 (H.C.J.) ...............................................................................33

Genner v. Sparks (1704), 6 Mod. Rep. 173, 87 E.R. 928 (Q.B.) .....................202

Goodine v. R., 2006 NBCA 109 ........................................ 77, 80, 89, 90, 94, 95

Green v. Lawrence (1998), 163 D.L.R. (4th) 115, 127 C.C.C. (3d)

416, [1998] M.J. No. 335 (C.A.) ................................................................28

Hamel v. Canada, [1999] 3 F.C. 335, 175 D.L.R. (4th) 323, 1999

CanL II 9337 (F.C.A.) ................................................................................85

Hayes v. Canada (Royal Can adian Mounted Police) (1985), 17

D.L.R. (4th) 751, 18 C.C.C. (3d) 254, [1985] B.C.J. No. 1904

(C. A.) ........................................................................................................37

Hayward v. Woolworth (1979), 23 Nf‌ld. & P.E.I.R. 17, 8 C.C.L.T.

157, [1979] N.J. No. 118 (S.C.T.D.) .........................................................222

Holgate-Mohammed v. Duke, [1984] A.C. 437 (H.L.) ..................................203

Hudson v. Brantford Police Services Board (2001), 204 D.L.R. (4th)

645, 158 C.C.C. (3d) 390, [2001] O.J. No. 3779 (C.A.) ...............26, 29, 38

Hunter v. Southam. See Canada (Combines Investigation Act

Director of Investigation and Research) v. Southam Inc.

Ilnicki v. Macleod, 2003 ABQB 4 65 ..............................................................185

Jensen v. Stemmer, 2007 MBCA 42 ..............................................................233

Karogiannis v. Poulus (1976), 72 D.L.R. (3d) 253, [1976] 6 W.W.R.

197, [1976] B.C.J. No. 1388 (S.C.) ..........................................................221

Kendall v. Gambles Canad a Ltd. (1981), 11 Sask. R. 361, [1981]

4 W.W.R. 718, [1981] S.J. No. 1280 (Q.B) ...............................224, 225, 227

Korponay v. Canada (A.G.), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 41, 65 C.C.C. (2d)

65, [1982] S.C.J. No. 111 ................................................................286, 287