Table of cases

Author:Steve Coughlan - Glen Luther
Profession:Professor, Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University - Associate Professor, College of Law, Saskatchewan
Pages:325-343
 
FREE EXCERPT
325
TABLE OF CASES
Banyasz v. K-Mart Canada Ltd. (1986), 57 O.R. (2d) 445, 33 D.L.R.
(4th) 474, [1986] O.J. No. 1244 (Div. Ct.) ..............................................222
Baron v. Canada, [1993] 1 S.C.R. 416, 99 D.L.R. (4th) 350, 1993
CanLI I 154 .........................................................................................7 7, 78
Briggs v. Laviolette (1994), 21 C.C.L.T. (2d) 105, [1994] B.C.J.
No. 1646 (S.C.) .......................................................................................223
Brown v. Durham (Regional Municipa lity) Police Force (1998),
43 O.R. (3d) 223, 131 C.C.C. (3d) 1, [1998] O.J. No. 5274
(C. A.) .......................................................................... 36, 62, 112, 141, 258
Campbell v. Edmonton (City) Police Service (1985), 66 A.R. 222,
[1986] 2 W.W.R. 444, [1985] A.J. No. 538 (C.A.) .....................................35
Canada (Combines Investigation Act Director of Investigation &
Research) v. Southam Inc., [1984] 2 S.C.R. 145, 55 A.R. 291,
[1984] S.C.J. No. 36 .....................................................15, 19, 21, 39, 61, 77
Canada v. Galbraith, 20 01 BCSC 675 ...........................................................164
Casey v. Automobiles Renault Canada Ltd., [1965] S.C.R. 607, 54
D.L.R. (2d) 600, [1965] S.C.J. No. 33 .....................................................165
Chartier v. Greaves, [2001] O.T.C. 121, 103 A.C.W.S. (3d) 1054,
[2001] O.J. No. 634 (S.C.J.) ......................................................................28
Chartier v. Quebec (A.G.), [1979] 2 S.C.R. 474, 104 D.L.R. (3d)
321, [1979] S.C.J. No. 56 ..........................................................................79
Christie v. Leachi nsky, [1947] 1 All E.R. 567, [1947] A.C. 573,
[1947] UKHL 2 .....................................................................34, 35, 262–64
Cloutier v. Langlois, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 158, 53 C.C.C. (3d) 257,
[1990] S.C.J. No. 10 ......................................................................47, 48, 49
DETENTION AND AR REST326
Cluett v. R., [1985] 2 S.C.R. 216, 21 D.L.R. (4th) 306, [1985] S.C.J.
No. 54 ................................................................................................. 26, 27
Crampton v. Walton, 2005 ABCA 81 ..................................................26, 27, 28
Dallison v. Caffery, [1964] 3 W.L.R. 38 (C.A.) .............................................197
Dedman v. The Queen. See R. v. Dedman
Dendekker v. F.W. Woolworth Co., [1975] 3 W.W.R. 429 (Alta. S.C.) ..........221
Downing v. Capel (1867), L.R. 2 C.P. 461 ....................................................218
Dumbell v. Roberts, [1944] 1 All E.R. 326 (C.A.) ........................................217
Eccles v. Bourque (1974), [1975] 2 S.C.R. 739, 50 D.L.R. (3d) 753,
[1974] S.C.J. No. 123 ................................................12, 26, 38, 78, 79, 138
Eldridge v. British Columbia (A.G.), [1997] 3 S.C.R. 624, 151
D.L.R. (4th) 577, [1997] S.C.J. No. 86 ......................................................71
Ell v. Alberta, 2003 SCC 35 ..........................................................................158
Ex parte Chung (1975), 26 C.C.C. (2d) 497, [1975] 5 W.W.R.
561, [1975] B.C.J. No. 1077 (S.C.), aff’d (1976), 26 C.C.C.
(2d) 4 97 (B.C.C .A.) ................................................................................17 5
Fletcher v. Collins, [1968] 2 O.R. 618, 70 D.L.R. (2d) 183, [1968]
O.J. No. 1206 (H.C.J.) ...............................................................................33
Genner v. Sparks (1704), 6 Mod. Rep. 173, 87 E.R. 928 (Q.B.) .....................202
Goodine v. R., 2006 NBCA 109 ........................................ 77, 80, 89, 90, 94, 95
Green v. Lawrence (1998), 163 D.L.R. (4th) 115, 127 C.C.C. (3d)
416, [1998] M.J. No. 335 (C.A.) ................................................................28
Hamel v. Canada, [1999] 3 F.C. 335, 175 D.L.R. (4th) 323, 1999
CanL II 9337 (F.C.A.) ................................................................................85
Hayes v. Canada (Royal Can adian Mounted Police) (1985), 17
D.L.R. (4th) 751, 18 C.C.C. (3d) 254, [1985] B.C.J. No. 1904
(C. A.) ........................................................................................................37
Hayward v. Woolworth (1979), 23 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 17, 8 C.C.L.T.
157, [1979] N.J. No. 118 (S.C.T.D.) .........................................................222
Holgate-Mohammed v. Duke, [1984] A.C. 437 (H.L.) ..................................203
Hudson v. Brantford Police Services Board (2001), 204 D.L.R. (4th)
645, 158 C.C.C. (3d) 390, [2001] O.J. No. 3779 (C.A.) ...............26, 29, 38
Hunter v. Southam. See Canada (Combines Investigation Act
Director of Investigation and Research) v. Southam Inc.
Ilnicki v. Macleod, 2003 ABQB 4 65 ..............................................................185
Jensen v. Stemmer, 2007 MBCA 42 ..............................................................233
Karogiannis v. Poulus (1976), 72 D.L.R. (3d) 253, [1976] 6 W.W.R.
197, [1976] B.C.J. No. 1388 (S.C.) ..........................................................221
Kendall v. Gambles Canad a Ltd. (1981), 11 Sask. R. 361, [1981]
4 W.W.R. 718, [1981] S.J. No. 1280 (Q.B) ...............................224, 225, 227
Korponay v. Canada (A.G.), [1982] 1 S.C.R. 41, 65 C.C.C. (2d)
65, [1982] S.C.J. No. 111 ................................................................286, 287

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP