Table of cases

• Author: Barbara Von Tigerstrom
• Pages: 495-524

495

TABLE OF CASES

131 Queen Street Limited v Ca nada (Attorney General),

2007 FC 347 (TD) ................................................................................1 97, 2 00

3430901 Canada Inc v Ca nada (Minister of Industr y),

2001 FCA 254 ................................................................172, 173, 174, 226, 227

3510395 Canad a Inc, operating as Compu.Finder — Constitutional

Challenge to Can ada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (19 October 2017),

Compliance and Enforce ment Decision

CR TC 2017-3 67 ....................................... 11, 397, 398, 399, 402, 408, 423, 424

3510395 Canad a Inc, operating as Compu.Finder — Violations of

Canada’s Anti-Spa m Legislation (19 October 2017),

Compliance and Enforce ment Decision

CR TC 2017-3 68 ...................... 4 04, 412, 415, 421, 424, 425, 426, 427, 428, 432

9083-2957 Québec Inc c Caiss e populaire de Rivière-des -Prairies,

2004 CanL II 32390 (Que CA) .....................................................................360

AB v Bragg Commun ications Inc, 2012 SCC 46......................................... 144, 27 2

ABC v St George’s Healthca re NHS Trust & Ors, [2017] EWCA Civ 336 ......... 447

AC v Manitoba (Director of Chi ld and Family Services), 2009 SCC 30 .............. 13

Action Auto Leasing & G allery Inc v Gray, 2013 CanLII 57491

(Ont Sm Cl Ct) ............................................................................................. 119

Adeleye-Olusae v Man itoba (Minister of Labour and Imm igration),

2011 MBQB 146 ....................................................................................179, 2 45

AFL Philadelphi a LLC v Krause, 639 F Supp 2d 512 (ED Pa 2009) ....................60

After a Signi ficant Adobe Data Breach, Customer Quest ions Company’s

Security S afeguards and the Resp onse It Provided About Impacts on

His Personal In formation, PIPEDA Report of Findings

#2014-015, 2014 CanLII 90236 (PCC) ........................................................300

INFORM ATION AND PRIVACY LAW IN CAN ADA496

Agnew-America no v Equifax Canada, 2018 ONSC 275 ...............117, 118, 131, 133

Air Atonabee Ltd v C anada (Minister of Transport), [1989] FTR 194

(FC TD) .......................................................................... 192, 196, 198, 199, 202

Air Canad a v Canada (Attorney General), 2018 FC 378 ....................................202

Air Transat AT Inc v Canad a (Transport), 2017 FC 910 (TD)............19 4, 199, 200

Albayate v Bank of Mont real, 2015 BCSC 695 ...................................................132

Albert c Brien , [2000] RJQ 1430 (CS) ................................................................. 453

Alberta (Di rector of Child Welfare) v CHS, 2005 ABQB 695 ............ 264, 27 1, 272

Alberta (Di rector of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement) v

DCR, 2019 ABQB 47 .....................................................................................261

Alberta (Infor mation and Privacy Commi ssioner) v United Food and

Commercial Workers, Loc al 401, 2013 SCC 62 .....11, 301, 30 2, 321, 322, 36 6

Alberta (Informat ion and Privacy Commissioner) v United Food and Commercial

Workers, Local 401). See United Food and Commercial Workers, Local 401 v

Alberta (Attorn ey General)

Alberta (Infor mation and Privacy Commi ssioner) v University of

Calgary, 2016 SCC 53 ...........................................................188, 189, 190, 227

Alberta v Hutter ian Brethren of Wilson Colony, 2009 SCC 37 ............................. 8

Aldervi lle First Nation v Canada, 2017 FC 631 ................................................. 272

Al-Ghamdi v A lberta, 2017 ABQB 684 .................................................................99

AM v Ryan, [1997] 1 SCR 157.............................................................441, 442, 443

Amalgamat ed Transit Union, Lo cal 1724, Order P17-02, 2017 BCIPC 28 .........330

An Incorporated De ntist’s Practice, Re, BC Order P06- 01,

2006 CanLI I 13537 (BC IPC) ......................................................................333

An Insura nce Company’s Internal Ombudsma n Office Is Not a

“Formal Dispute Re solution Process” Under PIPEDA, PIPEDA

Report of Finding s #2016-006, 2016 CanLII 104113 (PCC) ..............335, 336

Aquasource Ltd v Br itish Columbia (Freedom of Information and

Protection of Priva cy Commissioner), 1998 CanLII 6444 (BCCA) ..... 169 –70

Ari v Insur ance Corporation of British Columbi a, 2013 BCSC 1308,

aff’d 2015 BCCA 468 ................................................. 80, 84, 99, 126, 289, 290

Ari v Insur ance Corporation of British Columbi a, 2019 BCCA 183 ....................82

ARPA Canada and Patr icia Maloney v R, 2017 ONSC 3285..................10, 144, 164

Assista nt Commissioner Considers the Nat ure of Certain Dispute

Resolution Proces ses in Denial of Access Compl aint, PIPEDA Case

Summary #20 06-330, 2006 Can LII 29532 (PCC) ......................................336

AstraZene ca Canada Inc v Canada (Mi nister of Health),

2005 FC 189 ......................................................................................... 194, 19 9

AT v Globe24h.com, 2017 FC 114 ....................300, 314, 319–20, 321, 343, 364 –65,

390, 391, 392

Athans v Ca nadian Adventure Camps Ltd (1977), 17 OR (2d) 425

(HCJ) ..................................................................................... 101, 10 2, 104, 10 8

Atlantic Hig hways Corporation v Nova Scotia, 1997 CanLII 11497 (NSSC) .... 195

Attorney General v Gu ardian Newspapers Ltd (No 1), [1987] 1 WLR 1248,

[1987] 3 All ER 316 (HL) ...............................................................................62

Attorney General v Gu ardian Newspapers Ltd (No 2), [1990] 1 AC 109 ............62